Hi all,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today Fernando Perez gave a very inspiring and enthusiastic talk today
> at Sage Days 29 on Scientific Computing using Python, including a
> historical introduction with a story about how he accidentally
> unplugged the inte
Hi,
Today Fernando Perez gave a very inspiring and enthusiastic talk today
at Sage Days 29 on Scientific Computing using Python, including a
historical introduction with a story about how he accidentally
unplugged the internet for the entire country of Colombia when he was
a grad student. You ca
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:37 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 19, 2011 7:31:21 AM UTC+1, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>>
>>> Why has a decision been made not to make a GSoC application?
>>
>> There was no such decision and I wa
On Mar 24, 6:30 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Hi Andrey!
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:28:48PM -0700, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> > I am not sure how relevant it is, but there is a function
> > sage.geometry.polyhedra.Hasse_diagram_from_incidences
> > which actually may be useful for m
Hi Andrey!
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:28:48PM -0700, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> I am not sure how relevant it is, but there is a function
> sage.geometry.polyhedra.Hasse_diagram_from_incidences
> which actually may be useful for more general posets than just face
> lattices.
>
> So perha
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:24:19AM +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Are libraries somewhat similar in spirit to the method .an_element?
Nothing has been formalized about them. But yeah, graphs, digraphs,
posets, species all have a role between "collection of examples"
(similar in spirit to an_element(
"Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
> How does this all sound?
Very nice!
Martin
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.
Hi Poset fans,
I just recalled that there already exists two categories
PartialyOrderedSets and PartialyOrderedMonoids, with aliases
OrderedSets and OrderedMonoids. At this point, those categories are
stubs, and are not used anywere in the Sage code.
Since the terminology "Poset" (rather
Are libraries somewhat similar in spirit to the method .an_element?
Martin
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.c
Hi Rob!
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:47:34AM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
> The only advantage I could see to uppercase would be if every category
> *automatically* came with the infrastructure for collections.
This triggers my curiosity. Do you have some specific features you
would dream of ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
