http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/04/23/1220202/Google-Will-Save-Videos-After-All
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
> However... the URL's have of course all changed. They are videos
> mostly from various Sage Days, so it would be very beneficial if
> somebody could go throug
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:45 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 23, 9:56 am, Florent Hivert
> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> > There is another quite common mistake:
>>
>> > It should be
>> > EXAMPLE::
>>
>> > sage: bla
>>
>> > and not
>>
>> > EXAMPLE:
>> > sage: bla
>>
>
>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Martin Albrecht
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Google video is going offline:
>>
>> http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/04/16/160256/Google-Videos-Going-Offline-
>> Time-To-Grab-What-You-Want
>>
>> So if anyone wants t
On Apr 23, 10:44 am, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> The `symbolic_inverse` function you posted on ask.sagemath looks good.
> I might suggest catching the RuntimeError when no roots are found and
> raising a more informative error, e.g. "Sage could not find a symbolic
> inverse" ...
I am thinking about d
The `symbolic_inverse` function you posted on ask.sagemath looks good.
I might suggest catching the RuntimeError when no roots are found and
raising a more informative error, e.g. "Sage could not find a symbolic
inverse" ...
--
Benjamin Jones
benjaminfjo...@gmail.com
On Apr 23, 3:38 am, Kelvin Li
On Apr 23, 9:56 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> > There is another quite common mistake:
>
> > It should be
> > EXAMPLE::
>
> > sage: bla
>
> > and not
>
> > EXAMPLE:
> > sage: bla
>
And it should be
EXAMPLES:
We here give an interesting examp
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11243
Testing and reviewing welcome.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://
Hi Martin,
On 23 Apr., 00:04, Martin Raum
wrote:
> But this now works just like the issue that Wiliam's originally has
> risen. Without changing code. So I have to think about what happened,
> before I can give you an example. Definitely #9944 is a candidate to
> cause this.
If this is really th
Hi Florent,
On 23 Apr., 15:56, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Sure ! I thought this one was too basic...
You can find it quite often, my impression.
Isn't there a skript to find common markup errors? If not, it would
seem useful to write one.
> Thanks !!! To avoid endless problem with rebasing sage-c
Hi Simon,
> There is another quite common mistake:
>
> It should be
> EXAMPLE::
>
> sage: bla
>
> and not
>
> EXAMPLE:
> sage: bla
Sure ! I thought this one was too basic...
> Just to avoid duplication of work: We killed a bunch of those mistakes
> in #9976.
Th
Hi Florent,
On 23 Apr., 15:27, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Now here is a random and non exhaustive lists of common mistakes:
>
> 1 - Do NOT indent bullet lists (unless you want extra indentation) and leave a
> blank line at the end as
> """
> INPUT:
>
> - ``self`` -- bla bla
> - ``opts`` -- .
Hi there,
Rereading a few patch, I've found a bunch of systematically wrong Sphinx
markup. Just to make sure, let me recall a few fact about ReST and Sphinx.
First of all, when I'm unsure of a markup, I found [1] quite helpful as well
as concise. When a more advanced markup is needed I ofte
> While working on getting sage to work with python-2.7.1 I encountered a
> segfault in sage which seems to come from libsingular.
> In fact the backtrace points to line 127 of kernel/ideals.cc in the
> singular source code:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> id_Delete (h=0x50
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:08:08AM +1200, Francois Bissey wrote:
> > >I'll leave the patch to you! Thanks for taking care of that.
> >
> > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11236
>
> Thanks, building right now. Could you have a look at the two small
> patches I posted in #9958? I
On Apr 23, 1:22 am, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:09 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> > > Hi Kelvin,
>
> > > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > > Kelvin Li wrote:
> > > > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica
On Apr 14, 1:09 pm, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On Apr 14, 1:03 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Kelvin,
>
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Kelvin Li wrote:
> > > Is anybody working on implementing something similar to mathematica's
> > > InverseFunction? Or is there already a trac
16 matches
Mail list logo
