On May 15, 11:38 pm, Volker Braun wrote:
> Fair enough. I think 32-bit guests can work with software virtualization
> irregardless of the processor/host OS bitwidth, so thats probably safer. I
> made another VM with F14 i386 + Sage-4.6.2:
>
> http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/Sage-4.6.2.ova
>
>
On 14 Mai, 17:40, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On May 13, 7:18 pm, Thomas Feulner
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > On 7 Mai, 07:04, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > > On May 6, 9:12 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>
> > > > Hi:
>
> > > > The contribution at #10153 byThomasFeulneris huge and,
> > > > IMHO, importan
Fair enough. I think 32-bit guests can work with software virtualization
irregardless of the processor/host OS bitwidth, so thats probably safer. I
made another VM with F14 i386 + Sage-4.6.2:
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/Sage-4.6.2.ova
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an email to
squaring both sides of an equation often produces extraneous
"solutions" as you've illustrated.
Maxima's solve program produces the illustrated form when it cannot
solve any better. It is presumably a feature.
Also a feature: It does not produce extraneous solutions and check
them afterwards, at
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2011-05-13 07:24, Tom Boothby wrote:
>> Bottom line: I think this was handled wrong. If a ticket's been
>> merged, unless it's found to have a genuine flaw, it should supersede
>> (IMO) tickets with positive reviews which have not been merged.
> In this case, the *autho
On 2011-05-15 16:15, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> Le 15/05/2011 14:13, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
>> I'm still using latest stable :-)
>
> Well, I *was* still using it : I decided to check if it was still
> compiling correctly too, so I removed it and gave it a try : it doesn't
> compile anymore :-)
>
> (no
On 2011-05-13 07:24, Tom Boothby wrote:
> Bottom line: I think this was handled wrong. If a ticket's been
> merged, unless it's found to have a genuine flaw, it should supersede
> (IMO) tickets with positive reviews which have not been merged.
In this case, the *author* of those tickets decided to
Le 15/05/2011 14:13, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
I'm still using latest stable :-)
Well, I *was* still using it : I decided to check if it was still
compiling correctly too, so I removed it and gave it a try : it doesn't
compile anymore :-)
(not a big problem -- I wouldn't have tried that if I h
Le 15/05/2011 13:45, Volker Braun a écrit :
You are right, once again we see why LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be set.
I posted a workaround in
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/hLL02U1Q5zU/discussion
Good to know, but I'm not interested in a workaround : I just wanted to
give feedbac
You are right, once again we see why LD_LIBRARY_PATH should not be set. I
posted a workaround in
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/hLL02U1Q5zU/discussion
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-dev
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
I gave it a
I played a bit with gource, a project to visualize the repository activity.
Here is a quick YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOdzratlbQA&hd=1
* Every file is a dot, colored by file type
* Directories are branches of the tree
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@go
I had (what appeared to me to be) same/similar problems with UBUNTU
11.04
I had NOT attempted to install flask.
The "sage -fhttp://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/python-2.6.4.p10.spkg";
appeared to resolve that,
but I had to re-build docs to get the help and the tutorial up.
I run the plot3d examples as a c
> I think it would be nice if our Sage VM appliance could run on a wide
> variety of hardware, much as Sage itself does not require high-end
> machines to work.
>
> -- Kelvin
Very true - if Sage is primarily a research tool for mathematicians
then one doesn't need to worry about ressources to muc
Maybe the following workaround attempt
will be helpful?
var('x,mp,me')
eq=mp-sqrt(x^2+me^2)==x
assume(mp>0)
solve(eq^2,x)
[x == 1/2*(me^2 - mp^2)/mp, x == -1/2*(me^2 - mp^2)/mp]
On 15 Maj, 01:34, Dox wrote:
> Hi again list,
>
> This time I come with a problem of solving an algebraic expression
> On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> > Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
> >> At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
> >> would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
> >> whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I w
On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote:
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4
Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
sage-4.7rc2 s
18 matches
Mail list logo
