Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Perhaps: "unstable" or "nightly" or "latest alpha", or even "cutting edge".
> The warning could still be big and bold (like it should be!).
I have chosen "Development Release". Please test it out to see how usable it is.
--
Regar
David,
I am a bit embarrassed then. Sorry for the mix up, I should have more
carefully read the documentation.
David (also)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
In the first paragraph of the documentation it says:
"If its dimension is denoted k then we typically store a basis of C as
a kxn matrix,
with rows the basis vectors. It is called the generator matrix of C."
I personally define a generator matrix to be a full rank matrix. I assumed that
this was
This also seems to cause problems with decoding. I am posting here just to
make sure that this would actually be considered a bug, not just user error.
Everything works as expected when I construct the same code with a full
rank generator matrix.
(with C defined as before)
sage: C.deco
Hello everybody,
I think that I may have uncovered a bug in the weight distributions
(spectrum) code for binary codes, though it may just be me misusing the
function.
Problem:
When a binary code is constructed using a matrix that doesn't have full rank
then the spectrum calculation is incorr
Why does local/bin/sage-make_devel_packages chmod files in local/bin ? Isn't
local/bin under revision control? What's the need for this? If there is
none, can we remove this behavior? See lines 139-141 and trac #11449.
-Keshav
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.
I think no one uses this much, given that it has 4.6... but anyway,
I'll be using this for a workshop Saturday afternoon for an MAA
sectional conference. I may also use flask.sagenb.org as a backup.
Thanks!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fr
I agree about bleeding edge. Cutting edge sounds bettwe, but this is
only for a menu choice, so why not "development version"? As long as
developers can find it easily (though I usually download from a link
in an email anyway) and non-developers are gently discouraged from
expecting this to be th
On 6/9/11 8:11 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Please see
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
which is linked from
http://www.sagemath.org/download.html#DevelRelease
On second thought, the page
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.htm
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Please see
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> which is linked from
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/download.html#DevelRelease
On second thought, the page
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
is now linked from the optio
Hi Jeroen,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Would it be possible to make a page analogous to
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-source.html
> but for the development version?
That's a very sensible idea. Please see
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
which is li
Hi y'all!
On 9 Jun., 14:27, pang wrote:
> > Seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637forthe latest!
>
> I'm the author of that patch. I've used sage -sws2rst with many
> complex worksheets, but they were all mine. I'll be happy to get some
> feedback and write some extra code if it doesn
> > Is there an easy way to take an existing worksheet (with text fields,
> > code and output) and translate it to rst format, such that it can
> > easily be included in the docs?
>
> Seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637for the latest!
I'm the author of that patch. I've used sage -sw
Thanks!
Would it be possible to make a page analogous to
http://www.sagemath.org/download-source.html
but for the development version?
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegr
Hi Jeroen,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> The last development version of Sage is always mirrored, see for example
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/sage/devel/
>
> However, this doesn't seem to be advertised anywhere. I think the page
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu
Hi Simon,
I am one of those who eagerly hope the thematic tutorial to be written and
maintained by the core developers of Sage. The article should explain on
parents, elements, categories, coercion, morphisms, homsets, and the
canonical way to program an algebraic structure on the basic concept
On 2011-06-08 18:02, Mike Hansen wrote:
> This should be fixed by
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11389 which needs review.
Indeed it is fixed by this!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+
17 matches
Mail list logo
