implicit_multiplication(10) still does not interpret "x (x)" as x^2
but rather as a function call.
Rarely do I put a space between the function name and the argument
list.
It would seem to be a useful new option to allow implicit
multiplication that interprets
a letter followed by a space and an o
Graphviz would not install as pkg-config was not reading the
pangocairo.pc in the grphviz configure file in the sage environment so
it was not setting the includes correctly. Cause is a duplication of
SAGE_ROOT definition in sage's local libpng12.pc. This problem with
the libpng.pc file also fea
Hi,
Am 21.08.2011 um 20:35 schrieb Mike Hansen:
> What browser are using?
Safari 5.1 on OS X Lion.
Ivo.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Ivo Hedtke wrote:
> Doesn't work for me: Login -> click on Sage Days 32 -> I am instantly logged
> out.
What browser are using?
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage
On Aug 20, 12:30 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Since you mention "InputForm[]", I can't help but mention Sage's
> analogue of that (written by Carl Witty), which is called
> "sage_input":
After posting, I knew I should have done a modicum of research first.
Thanks for the reminder about sage_input()
On Aug 20, 12:32 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Number fields defined by polynomials that are not monic *and* integral
> are not supported by PARI.
OK, thanks for the explanation.
> It would probably be a 2-3 day project for somebody to make Sage fully
> support fields
Hmm, I don't think I am that
Hi,
Doesn't work for me: Login -> click on Sage Days 32 -> I am instantly logged
out.
Ivo.
Am 21.08.2011 um 04:37 schrieb leif:
> On 19 Aug., 23:18, Ivo Hedtke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have problems with it.
>>
>> I click on "Login" and use my username and password from trac. That works.
>>
>
On Aug 20, 10:09 pm, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> One more thing: let's just have a formal vote now and not bent the rules.
It's important to have rules so that we have something to bend. But if
you insist:
> So:
> [X] yes, c'mon why isn't it included already
> [] yes but write a paper about it fir
