On 13 Okt., 15:43, kcrisman wrote:
> > > 2) I *think* that report 21 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/
> > > 21) is correctly listed on the front page as "tickets you've
> > > participated in", but is *not* correct on the page of reports (http://
> > > trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report)
On 10/13/11 11:10 PM, leif wrote:
On 13 Okt., 12:57, Jason Grout wrote:
On 10/13/11 3:05 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
It seems to be a more general bug in the function *graphs()*. Even this
code fails to give any output:
def isc(g): return g.is_clique()
Genn = graphs(3, isc)
[_ for _ in Genn]
R
On 13 Okt., 12:57, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 10/13/11 3:05 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> > It seems to be a more general bug in the function *graphs()*. Even this
> > code fails to give any output:
> > def isc(g): return g.is_clique()
> > Genn = graphs(3, isc)
> > [_ for _ in Genn]
>
> Read the docum
It looks like Sage was ahead of the curve; it fits right
into this new science code manifesto:
http://sciencecodemanifesto.org/
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
F
> > 2) I *think* that report 21 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/
> > 21) is correctly listed on the front page as "tickets you've
> > participated in", but is *not* correct on the page of reports (http://
> > trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report) where it says, "Open tickets I
> > particip
On 10/13/11 3:05 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
It seems to be a more general bug in the function *graphs()*. Even this
code fails to give any output:
def isc(g): return g.is_clique()
Genn = graphs(3, isc)
[_ for _ in Genn]
Read the documentation a little closer (or maybe the documentation needs
to
Property doesn't work quite like you think it might: the property
needs to possess certain inheritance features. (Frankly, I might have
named it "heritable_property" or something instead.)
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6210
and
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread
On 13 Okt., 11:34, leif wrote:
> - We /may/ add "confirmed" for duplicate/invalid tickets to replace
> "positive review", which would IMHO be more appropriate or intuitive.
And / or -- even better -- add "duplicate" to the ticket *types*,
instead of (just) using a special milestone for these.
On 12 Okt., 16:01, kcrisman wrote:
> I don't know how to change Trac's settings. But here are two things
> that someone should change, that are hopefully (?) easy.
>
> 1) I've been a little annoyed that sometimes people set a ticket to
> 'needs info', and then the only option is to set it to 'nee
On 12 Okt., 16:01, kcrisman wrote:
> 2) I *think* that report 21 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/
> 21) is correctly listed on the front page as "tickets you've
> participated in", but is *not* correct on the page of reports (http://
> trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report) where it says,
It seems to be a more general bug in the function *graphs()*. Even this code
fails to give any output:
def isc(g): return g.is_clique()
Genn = graphs(3, isc)
[_ for _ in Genn]
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage: list(graphs(4,lambda y: y.is_regular()))
[Graph on 4 vertices]
Where are the other regular graphs on 4 vertices gone? Cf.
sage: filter(lambda y: y.is_regular(), graphs(4))
[Graph on 4 vertices, Graph on 4 vertices, Graph on 4 vertices, Graph on 4
vertices]
(the value 4 is not special, sam
12 matches
Mail list logo
