>
> As for why your viewpoint might be harmful: I have heard anecdotes of
> people
> not wanting to release their code because it was ugly, or nonstandard, or
> difficult to use, etc. As long as the response that they are going to
> receive
> it along the lines of the above, that viewpoint is valid
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> But it makes the code unportable. What hope do we have with the Sun/Oracle
> compiler if idiots use non-standard C? What hope do we have if we try to
> build on Windows at some point in the future using a native compiler? All
> these GNU
I'm not actually a cython developer, so I don't know what the issues
involved are. I agree that a compile time error would be nice
David
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:29, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:39:06PM -0800, David Roe wrote:
> >The inlined
On Saturday, 4 February 2012 11:53:35 UTC+8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2 February 2012 23:05, rjf <> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't know about arithmetic on ARM specifically, but there is
>> something
>> wrong with a gamma() function that fails to return an integer (perhaps
>> in float format) w
On 2 February 2012 23:05, rjf wrote:
>
> I don't know about arithmetic on ARM specifically, but there is
> something
> wrong with a gamma() function that fails to return an integer (perhaps
> in float format) when it is
> given an integer argument (perhaps in float format), and the answer is
> ex
Very straightforward, with one bump - the supplied Parma Polyhedron
Library libppl.so.9.0.0 confused the linker, so a single unresolved
symbol was found. The compilation failed. At that point, I pointed the
symbolic links in sagedir/local/lib to the version of libppl that
comes with the SuSE distru
On Feb 3, 5:10 pm, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is a known bug? Or maybe not considered a bug at all? Quick search
> does not show anything related...
>
> sage: f(x) = x
> sage: f
> x |--> x
> sage: integral(f, x)
> x |--> 1/2*x^2
> sage: integral(f, x, 0, 1)
> x |--> 1/2
>
> The la
Hello,
It is a known bug? Or maybe not considered a bug at all? Quick search
does not show anything related...
sage: f(x) = x
sage: f
x |--> x
sage: integral(f, x)
x |--> 1/2*x^2
sage: integral(f, x, 0, 1)
x |--> 1/2
The last line shows 1/2 as a function of x, but it is not a function
anymore, i
I have reconfigured the storage server in the sage cluster, and will
be re-enabling it at 12 midnight PST on Feb 10/11 (this should be
right in between the all the sage days going on). This should
hopefully resolve some of the io issues that we have been experiencing
since last July. The downtime w
Hi David,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:39:06PM -0800, David Roe wrote:
>The inlined generator expressions (introduced in Cython 0.13) were
>disabled in favour of full generator expression support. This breaks code
>that previously used them inside of cdef functions (usage in def
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Georg S. Weber
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> interesting.
> I have the faint hope that the fix at
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12161
> (which I hope to review this weekend --- it requires building twice a
> Sage app on OS X 10.6, and then test these on OS X 10.
Hi,
interesting.
I have the faint hope that the fix at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12161
(which I hope to review this weekend --- it requires building twice a
Sage app on OS X 10.6, and then test these on OS X 10.7) will also
cure this. Even though this new report is on OS X 10.6!
On Friday, February 3, 2012 8:33:53 AM UTC-8, William wrote:
>
>
> Just to clarify, does gcc-4.2 *not* come with the latex XCode 4.x, but
> it came with earlier XCode 4.x's?I have gcc-4.2 on my laptop, and
> I've never installed anything but XCode 4.x on it.
>
> Just curious.
>
I think that
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmi
On Monday, 30 January 2012 21:12:43 UTC+8, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Hello everybody !!!
>
> I wondered why we still had .py files in our library. Some time ago
> this made sense as there were Python features that were not available
> in Cython -- like the yield keyword -- but now that they are, w
On Friday, 3 February 2012 09:28:37 UTC+8, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM, rjf <> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't know about arithmetic on ARM specifically, but there is
>> something
>> wrong with a gamma() function that fails to return an integer (perhaps
>> in float format) whe
Le 03/02/2012 10:56, Jonathan Bober a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Julien Puydt mailto:julien.pu...@laposte.net>> wrote:
Well, if I don't err, $10^{17}$ has 18 decimal digits, which is more
than the 15,95.. that fit in 53 binary digits.
It is not that simple. 15.95 digits i
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
>
> Well, if I don't err, $10^{17}$ has 18 decimal digits, which is more than
> the 15,95.. that fit in 53 binary digits.
>
It is not that simple. 15.95 digits is more like a guideline. At issue is
whether the number in question can be exactly r
I cc: this to sage-combinat-devel, as there more people who do this kind of
stuff hang on a regular basis.
On Thursday, 2 February 2012 07:40:07 UTC+8, Matthieu Deneufchâtel wrote:
>
> I tried to remove all the french expressions in my code.
>
>
> ## Lyndon words ##
19 matches
Mail list logo
