On 2012-04-05 08:36, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I guessed you missed this part:
>>> $ ./sage --sh
To clarify: this should be done within the Sage install which failed to
build MPIR before. It seems that GCC has been built successfully, but
that MPIR cannot be built with that new GCC. So I would lik
I guessed you missed this part:
>> $ ./sage --sh
The log file you sent me is with Apple's compiler, not Sage's GCC.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, v
When working on the documentation for solve, the doctests mysteriously
failed after adding to the examples section. The parts that I added
weren't complained about, so I decided to do some manual testing.
If you solve an equation and the answer has a dummy variable, it
produces the correct result.
Never mind, I needed to add another variable inside the log:
a*log(b*x+c)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co
Hello,
There seems to be a major problem with find_fit and logarithms; see
http://aleph.sagemath.org/?q=6d615153-7ec1-4a2a-a98d-14b66649fa5d. It seems
any combination of variables and data returns 1.0. It works fine with sin,
for example.
This is not a problem with the server, as I'm getting t
On Thursday, 5 April 2012 00:44:28 UTC+2, Anthony Durity wrote:
>
> To be very clear about this to avoid confusion.
>
> I have a white Macbook about 3 years old, designated a Macbook5,2
>
> http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/specs/macbook-core-2-duo-2.13-white-13-mid-2009-nvidia-specs.
To be very clear about this to avoid confusion.
I have a white Macbook about 3 years old, designated a Macbook5,2
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook/specs/macbook-core-2-duo-2.13-white-13-mid-2009-nvidia-specs.html
It's got 2ghz Core 2 duo so it's definitely got a 64bit cpu as in it
wo
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2012, at 12:22 , David Joyner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Just curious: is the 4.8 app dmg that you can download for OSX 10.6 working
>>> on OSX 10.7 now? Is that the recommended way
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2012, at 13:14 , David Joyner wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>> Hi, David,
>>>
>>> On Apr 4, 2012, at 09:40 , David Joyner wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 AM, David Joyner wrot
> ImportError: No module named _socket
>
That sort of breakage should be fixed by the OS X ...-app.p0.dmg's (note
the "p0") --- there was a trac a trac ticket and several discussions. I
don't think it has something to do with the bitness, i.e. 32 vs. 64. Did
you really use an older dmg "withou
On Apr 4, 2012, at 13:52 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Something else to try:
>
> Enter a sage shell:
>
> $ ./sage --sh
>
> Now manually extract the mpir spkg and ./configure it:
>
> $ cd spkg/standard
> $ tar xjf mpir-2.1.3.p10.spkg
> $ cd mpir-2.1.3.p10/src
> $ ./configure
>
> Send me the outp
> > 10.7.3. But I think it's on the slowest oldest ibook that will run lion:-)
>
> Newer 10.7 OS on older system; I'm the reverse. What does 'About This Mac'
> say your processor is?
I am running 10.7.3 on a newer Macbook Pro (2.2 GHz i7) and I get a
build failure with 5.0beta1.
Like Justin, I
Something else to try:
Enter a sage shell:
$ ./sage --sh
Now manually extract the mpir spkg and ./configure it:
$ cd spkg/standard
$ tar xjf mpir-2.1.3.p10.spkg
$ cd mpir-2.1.3.p10/src
$ ./configure
Send me the output and config.log
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googl
On Apr 4, 2012, at 12:22 , David Joyner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Just curious: is the 4.8 app dmg that you can download for OSX 10.6 working
>> on OSX 10.7 now? Is that the recommended way to run the Sage app on OSX
>> 10.7?
>
>
> I get an error when I
On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:03 , Anthony Durity wrote:
> Hi Sage people,
>
> Scenario: clean install
[snip]
> I have 32 bit Snow Leopard but I thought that I could run 64 bit apps,
> I can, can't I?
What hardware system are you using. As David said, you can't run 64-bit
software on 32-bit hardware,
On Apr 3, 2012, at 23:34 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Also send me spkg/logs/mpir-2.1.3.p10.log
Enclosed.
> Did you set CFLAGS="-march=native"?
I did not set it explicitly.
Following (finally) Leif's suggestion from the b10 thread, I restarted the b12
build ( after removing spkg/build/mpir...).
On Apr 4, 2012, at 13:14 , David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> Hi, David,
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2012, at 09:40 , David Joyner wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 AM, David Joyner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
wro
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> Hi, David,
>
> On Apr 4, 2012, at 09:40 , David Joyner wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
>>> wrote:
Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try
Hi, David,
On Apr 4, 2012, at 09:40 , David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>>> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
>>> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK
> Starting with the huge work of Simon, an in depth optimization of the
> infrastructure of Sage is under way (Categories, Caching...). I'd like to
> be
> able to measure somehow the benefits for the end user. Unfortunately right
> now
> there is no systematic way to measure the variation of speed
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> What do you think ?
There is some work in this direction going on by David Roe and Robert
Bradshaw. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12720 .
Maybe they will have more to say on this.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an
Hi there,
Starting with the huge work of Simon, an in depth optimization of the
infrastructure of Sage is under way (Categories, Caching...). I'd like to be
able to measure somehow the benefits for the end user. Unfortunately right now
there is no systematic way to measure the variation of s
On Apr 1, 2:34 pm, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Substitution doesn't even work pre-evaluation:
>
>sage: f = function('f', x)
>sage: f_prime = f.diff(x)
> sage: g = function('g', x)
> sage: f_prime.substitute_function(f,g)
> D[0](f)(x)
That's because you're trying to substitute expr
At #12800, I'm doing a simple upgrade of the zlib spkg. It fixes some
portability issues, it builds with GCC 4.7.0 on Solaris, unlike the
previous version.
This is a very straight-forward upgrade, please review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12800
--
To post to this group, send an e
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Just curious: is the 4.8 app dmg that you can download for OSX 10.6 working
> on OSX 10.7 now? Is that the recommended way to run the Sage app on OSX
> 10.7?
I get an error when I double click on the app:
"An error occurred while trying to o
You can't run a 64-bit build on a 32-bit machine. I don't think that
there's a pre-build binary for 32-bit Snow Leopard, so you'll need to build
it from source.
David
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:03, Anthony Durity wrote:
> Hi Sage people,
>
> Scenario: clean install
>
> I have the sage-4.8-OSX-64b
Hi Sage people,
Scenario: clean install
I have the sage-4.8-OSX-64bit-10.6-x86_64-Darwin-app.dmg but it's
giving me the following error ...
Last login: Wed Apr 4 17:05:00 on ttys003
'/Applications/Sage-4.8-OSX-64bit-10.6.app/Contents/Resources/sage'/sage
--notebook
device-b72924:~ jollyrotten$
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
>> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>>
>> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sa
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 6:11:48 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
Many of these security holes have been plugged. It is now very hard to
access the local user disc from a Java applet that is not signed. This is
why when we switch to the signed applet to download the view in the new
version of the Jmol interface people get so many warnings. It is also why
J
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-04 12:26, David Joyner wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>>> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
>>> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>>>
>>> htt
On 2012-04-04 12:26, David Joyner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
>> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>>
>> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta1
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
>
It finally fin
33 matches
Mail list logo
