Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

HI On 15 July 2012 08:50, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On 14 July 2012 21:59, Julien Puydt wrote: > >> Le 14/07/2012 21:47, Jan Groenewald a écrit : >> >>> On 14 July 2012 21:26, Julien Puydt >> > wrote: >>> >>> Le 14/07/2012 21:22, Jan Groenewald a écr

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 14 July 2012 21:59, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 14/07/2012 21:47, Jan Groenewald a écrit : > >> On 14 July 2012 21:26, Julien Puydt > > wrote: >> >> Le 14/07/2012 21:22, Jan Groenewald a écrit : >> > (many things) >> >> I downloaded a buildlog

Re: [sage-devel] About rubiks

It's also important in an early published work on Sage. On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Julien Puydt > wrote: >> I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings >> interesting features... and I can't help but wo

Re: [sage-devel] About rubiks

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: > I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings > interesting features... and I can't help but wondering why rubiks is > standard and not optional? As far as I know, it's because it predates the notion of optional

[sage-devel] Sage in debian (WIP)

Hi, I updated my wiki package about the state of sage in debian (5.1 now): http://wiki.debian.org/JulienPuydt There is a new color category in my graph: purple... because there are cases where now debian has (or is pending to have) packages which are up to upstream's latest, while sage lingers

[sage-devel] About rubiks

Hi, I see discussions to make this or that other spkg standard because it brings interesting features... and I can't help but wondering why rubiks is standard and not optional? Snark on #sagemath -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from th

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Le 14/07/2012 21:47, Jan Groenewald a écrit : On 14 July 2012 21:26, Julien Puydt mailto:julien.pu...@laposte.net>> wrote: Le 14/07/2012 21:22, Jan Groenewald a écrit : > (many things) I downloaded a buildlog and had a look, but there was nothing interesting to see :-/ I can

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 14 July 2012 21:26, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 14/07/2012 21:22, Jan Groenewald a écrit : > > (many things) > > I downloaded a buildlog and had a look, but there was nothing interesting > to see :-/ > > I can do two things when time allows. 1. debuild -b locally, and 2. learn to use pbuilder

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Le 14/07/2012 21:22, Jan Groenewald a écrit : > (many things) I downloaded a buildlog and had a look, but there was nothing interesting to see :-/ Snark on #sagemath -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sag

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 14 July 2012 16:45, Jan Groenewald wrote: > On 13 July 2012 13:42, Jeroen Demeyer >> > wrote: >>> Can you build using "make -k" instead of "make"? This will make the >>> build continue after errors (but it will still respect dependencies). >>> >>

[sage-devel] Re: ECL on Cygwin

Mmmh, there is a script here Wed Oct 26 04:26:28 2011703 usr/sbin/fix-libtool-scripts-for-latest-gcc-runtimes.sh which i guess should be run at the end of the installation of gcc4 package. Not sure why it did not work. -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googl

[sage-devel] Re: ECL on Cygwin

On Saturday, 14 July 2012 23:16:07 UTC+8, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Saturday, July 14, 2012 10:04:02 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> What I gather from http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort is >> that you noticed bad linebreaks in patches. >> (yes, they confuse the

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: should CHomP be a standard spkg?

[X] Yes If licensing and versioning issues can be dealt with. It would be great to have polymake and Macaulay2, but as they are relatively big and long-compiling packages they are more difficult to include as standard. Except for convenience, the difference between optional and standard is that

[sage-devel] Re: ECL on Cygwin

On Saturday, July 14, 2012 10:04:02 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > What I gather from http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort is > that you noticed bad linebreaks in patches. > (yes, they confuse the hell out of Cygwin) Is this what you complain about? > Or something more serio

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 14 July 2012 16:37, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 13/07/2012 14:53, Jan Groenewald a écrit : > > On 13 July 2012 13:42, Jeroen Demeyer > > wrote: >> Can you build using "make -k" instead of "make"? This will make the >> build continue after errors (but

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

On 2012-07-14 16:43, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Perhaps only the filename is misleading. Could be. -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group a

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 13 July 2012 13:36, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-07-13 11:32, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Note: I think launchpad will build for i386 for the 32bit packages, not > > for i686 as > > the buildbot / sage scripts currently does. > Why do you think the buildbot builds for i686? The binaries

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Le 13/07/2012 14:53, Jan Groenewald a écrit : On 13 July 2012 13:42, Jeroen Demeyer mailto:jdeme...@cage.ugent.be>> wrote: Can you build using "make -k" instead of "make"? This will make the build continue after errors (but it will still respect dependencies). Somehow those debhelper

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Le 13/07/2012 13:36, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2012-07-13 11:32, Jan Groenewald wrote: Note: I think launchpad will build for i386 for the 32bit packages, not for i686 as the buildbot / sage scripts currently does. Why do you think the buildbot builds for i686? The binaries *should* work on

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 14 July 2012 13:39, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On 14 July 2012 09:17, Jan Groenewald wrote: > >> On 13 July 2012 17:18, Rob McMahon wrote: >>> >>> But you should be able to do >>> >> >>> #!/usr/bin/make -kf >>> >> >> Uploaded and building >> https://launchpad.net/~aims/+archive/sagem

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 14 July 2012 09:17, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On 13 July 2012 17:18, Rob McMahon wrote: > >> On 13/07/2012 15:43, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >>> On 2012-07-13 15:06, Javier López Peña wrote: >>> Sorry, that should be #!/usr/bin/make -k -f >>> No, you can't do that. "#

[sage-devel] Re: ECL on Cygwin

On Saturday, 14 July 2012 14:48:19 UTC+8, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > With the gcc4 package I also have gcc 4.5.3, without the need to >> resort to anything really unstable like a CVS version. (The latter can >> be very broken...) >> >> I know it's unsafe to use such a version, but some part

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath-monolithic PPA on launchpad

Hi On 13 July 2012 17:18, Rob McMahon wrote: > On 13/07/2012 15:43, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > >> On 2012-07-13 15:06, Javier López Peña wrote: >> >>> Sorry, that should be >>> #!/usr/bin/make -k -f >>> >> No, you can't do that. "#!" scripts support at most 1 command line >> option. >> >> But y