fero writes:
> IMHO gnutls should be removed from SAGE if it is just used for
> notebook secure=True to provide https connection,
> because this argument could be relegated to the deployment
> enivronment which should be in care of sysadmins that deploy
> SAGE notebook somewhere.
See trac #13392
Thanks for the report. This seems to be a bug indeed. Do you have a trac
account and are you willing to upload a patch to trac.sagemath.org?
Also can you tell us wheter this bug is reproducable and how you triggerd
it? This will be usefull for writing a small test that ensures it will not
get b
Dear all, I have hit a bug:
AttributeError at /do/2/
'module' object has no attribute 'ideal'
I fixed it by placing
import sage.rings.ideal
in
/opt/sage-5.2/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/misc/functional.py
A full backtrace as shown by Django error template, can be read at
http://pa
Dear all,
please forgive me if I say something "stupid", but I am still a SAGE newbie.
I have read this thread also because I experimented weird problems with the
libgnutls installed in sage
as you can read in
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/1674/psycopg2-importerror-libgnutls-on-debian-wheez
On 2012-08-26, Rajeev Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following when I try to use plot -
>
> $ sage -python
> Python 2.7.3 (default, Aug 21 2012, 14:05:59)
> [GCC 4.6.3] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pylab as plt
plt.plot( plt.
On 2012-08-25, Patrick wrote:
> I think I've discovered a bug in graphs/generic_graph.py:
>
> sage: g = graphs.PathGraph(3) # an unweighted graph
> sage: g.matching(value_only=True, use_edge_labels=True) # I get 1.0
> sage: g.matching(value_only=True, use_edge_labels=False) # I get 2
>
> Here's th
