2012/12/3 John H Palmieri :
> See
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/misc/6495-jsmath/html/en/reference/index.html
> for what the reference manual might look like if
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495 is every merged into Sage. Do
> you like that any better?
I do ! I thi
Hey everyone,
Two things on that note, I looked over the conventions page and noticed
some discrepancies, which is now ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13791 and I'd appreciate review.
Second, Andrea, there are many bugs which are not mathematical problems,
but errors in code
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:43:49 AM UTC-8, Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
>
>
> And now, for something completely different.
>
> I think that the reference manual is very useful, but its linear
> structure (a loong list of items where it is not obvious where to
> find what you are looking f
Your starting point should be the developer guide
(http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer), not the reference manual. The
latter is really for reference. I think the developer manual has a
reasonable explanation of the coercion model. A similar treatment of the
category framework is sorely lacki
Hi,
Actually, I think I agree with the request of WM Chung. I found myself
longing for a high-level overview of SAGE development. I think it
could be pretty simple, but that it could explain how some things are
organized. For instance :
*) what is the category framework? what purpose does it serv
Well, it was [2].
The patch is now ready for a review :-)
Thanks !
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-dev
> I take it the order of facets charged in this call:
Ahahahaahahah !! Stupid me. Yes, of course. I'll give it a try :-)
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To
I take it the order of facets charged in this call:
sage: sigma = rho.facets()[1]
The previous facet must be 0, 2, or 3. If you pick the right index then the
remaining doctests should be unchanged.
On Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:53:30 AM UTC-5, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> I am trying to write a
We have the trac keyword "beginner" basically for that purpose:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=needs_info&status=needs_review&status=needs_work&status=new&keywords=~beginner&col=id&col=summary&col=keywords&col=owner&col=type&col=status&col=priority&order=priority
On Sunday, Decem
2012/12/2 Simon King
> I think, you as a computer scientist should be aware that one hardly
> ever needs to take into account 5 million lines of code (that's about
> the size of Sage) in order to understand and contribute to one aspect
> of the system.
>
Ok but the point is that the entire struc
Hi Andrea,
On 2012-12-02, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
> The fact I don't understand the meaning of half of the parents of Integer
> (the Sage integer) is a clear sign that it would be hard for me to
> contribute.
Who says that you need to understand the whole mro of a class in order
to write a new
Helloo everybody
I am trying to write a patch (#13747) that changes the default nehaviour of
Poset, and I usually do so by updating the code when it is possible. I am
very lucky for the 9 doctests which I broke with my patch could
actually be fixed by removing a few things from th
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:58:16 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:35:08 PM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> I can't imagine that Wolfram Reserach would integrate with R via
>> pexpect. Unfortunately, I've never been that impressed with pexpect.
>>
>
> They
On 12/02/2012 05:11 PM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
2012/12/1 Volker Braun mailto:vbraun.n...@gmail.com>>
Inheritance tree:
sage: class_graph(Integer).plot()
This thing just got me to think I have to study the whole mathematics
before even trying to contribute to Sage... o.O
Not
2012/12/1 Volker Braun
> Inheritance tree:
>
> sage: class_graph(Integer).plot()
>
This thing just got me to think I have to study the whole mathematics
before even trying to contribute to Sage... o.O
--
*Andrea Lazzarotto* - http://andrealazzarotto.com*
*
--
You received this message be
15 matches
Mail list logo
