On Monday, April 15, 2013 3:11:27 PM UTC-4, Kenneth Lin wrote:
>
> That sounds great! I'll get working on it. It may take me a while to get
> familiar with the environment, so if anyone else is looking to help on this
> ticket too feel free to submit something before me. Also, P Purkayastha, do
There is a planned power outage at this end, during which time hawk will be
offline.
--
Dr. David Kirkby Ph.D C.Eng MIET
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
That sounds great! I'll get working on it. It may take me a while to get
familiar with the environment, so if anyone else is looking to help on this
ticket too feel free to submit something before me. Also, P Purkayastha, do
you happen to know why the previous patch didn't pass that review? I wo
Le 15/04/2013 17:40, Dan Drake a écrit :
I got an email today from a student who posted to sage-gsoc and didn't
get any responses. Looking around that list [1], right now it is almost
entirely tumbleweeds (student introductions) blowing about in the wind.
We need to respond to those students.
If
I got an email today from a student who posted to sage-gsoc and didn't
get any responses. Looking around that list [1], right now it is almost
entirely tumbleweeds (student introductions) blowing about in the wind.
We need to respond to those students.
If you think you might mentor a project, look
Dear all,
The update to FLINT 2.3 at #12173 has been functional for quite some time
now, but the bad shape of the patches were preventing a proper review by a
human being and so its inclusion into Sage.
I've now finally taken the time to refactor the patches into a much more
readable form, so f
Thanks! This is sufficient for me to experiment with it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this g
I'm not surprised that that file is different in my copy of Sage. The
lines I'm referring to are:
if len(want_values) != len(got_values):
return False
David
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:49 AM, cschwan wrote:
> Are you sure about lines 670 and 671? These point to docstrings in my
> case. Anywa
Are you sure about lines 670 and 671? These point to docstrings in my case.
Anyway, I have created a bug for this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14451.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
On 04/15/2013 02:59 PM, Jose Guzman wrote:
On 04/15/2013 07:33 AM, Kenneth Lin wrote:
Hi Sage development!
I'm new to the Sage development community. I've been using Sage for a
while now and I really like it, so I thought I'd try to help out and
contribute!
After using Sage a lot in my probabi
10 matches
Mail list logo
