Re: [sage-devel] Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

On 2013-05-07 03:59, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Are there others experiencing the same Sure, lots of people, mostly (or only?) on recent OS X systems. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

On Mon, 06 May 2013 20:39:26 Pong wrote: > Alright, I did a fresh compile with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC set to yes. This time > the compilation failed at gcc. > It only installed a few things before it hit gcc (e.g. Singular was not > complied) > > And here are the last few words it said before the crash:

Re: [sage-devel] _test_enough_doctests() miss count?

It seems the newline character "\" was causing them to be skipped. So, this is all good now. On Monday, May 6, 2013 9:20:40 PM UTC-6, Ben Hutz wrote: > > Thanks that helped. Actually, it does appear that four tests are not > being run, but I'm not sure why. Is it because the class code is just

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

On Monday, May 6, 2013 7:16:04 PM UTC-7, William wrote: > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:14 PM, John H Palmieri > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, May 6, 2013 6:59:39 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am experiencing consistent failure in building the latest Sage > inc

Re: [sage-devel] _test_enough_doctests() miss count?

Thanks that helped. Actually, it does appear that four tests are not being run, but I'm not sure why. Is it because the class code is just "pass"? class SchemeMorphism_point_abelian_variety_field\ (AdditiveGroupElement, SchemeMorphism_point_projective_field): """ A rational point

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

On Monday, May 6, 2013 10:16:04 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:14 PM, John H Palmieri > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, May 6, 2013 6:59:39 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am experiencing consistent failure in building the latest Sage > in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:14 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Monday, May 6, 2013 6:59:39 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am experiencing consistent failure in building the latest Sage including >> just released 5.9 at zn_poly. My system is MacPro Quad-Core Intel Xeon with >> OS X

[sage-devel] Re: Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

On Monday, May 6, 2013 6:59:39 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > I am experiencing consistent failure in building the latest Sage including > just released 5.9 at zn_poly. My system is MacPro Quad-Core Intel Xeon with > OS X 10.7.5 and latest Xcode (I think). Are there others experiencin

Re: [sage-devel] _test_enough_doctests() miss count?

You can run sage: from sage.doctest.sources import FileDocTestSource sage: filename = "sage/schemes/projective/projective_point.py" sage: FDS = FileDocTestSource(filename, True, True, True, False) sage: FDS._test_enough_doctests(verbose=True) which will tell you the lines that it believes are bei

[sage-devel] Consistent failure of zn_poly in latest Sage

Hi, I am experiencing consistent failure in building the latest Sage including just released 5.9 at zn_poly. My system is MacPro Quad-Core Intel Xeon with OS X 10.7.5 and latest Xcode (I think). Are there others experiencing the same? Here is the log: Now running zn_poly's self-tuning progra

[sage-devel] _test_enough_doctests() miss count?

I just rebased trac #14217 for sage.5.10.beta1, but I'm having an issue with the doctest in sage/doctest/source.py for the function _test_enough_doctests() It is also getting: "There are 4 tests in sage/schemes/projective/projective_point.p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

yes. Francois On 7/05/2013, at 3:41, "Pong" mailto:wypon...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Monday, May 6, 2013 2:19:47 AM UTC-7, François wrote: On 06/05/13 17:24, Pong wrote: > Oh... I see. I am ignorant on what various flags mean. > > Let me summarize my problems and see if I get them right: > > 1) my

[sage-devel] Assertion failure when saving graphs in pdf with the new version of matplotlib

Hi, The newly upgraded matplotlib library is causing an issue with pdf exports of graphs: sage: g = DiGraph([[1,2]]).plot() sage: g.save("bla.pdf") ... .../matplotlib/backends/backend_pdf.pyc in pop(self) 2091 2092 def pop(self): -> 2093 assert s

[sage-devel] Re: Huge packages

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Could you make it so that the directory spkg/huge on the mirrors redirects > to http://sagemath.org/spkg/huge? That could be done with a .htaccess > redirect. Sorry, that's not possible :-( I have no direct access to any of those voluneering

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

On Monday, May 6, 2013 2:19:47 AM UTC-7, François wrote: > > On 06/05/13 17:24, Pong wrote: > > Oh... I see. I am ignorant on what various flags mean. > > > > Let me summarize my problems and see if I get them right: > > > > 1) my gcc compiler confuses c and c++ programs. > > 2) I want to sol

[sage-devel] Re: Huge packages

On 05/06/2013 03:05 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: do you think it is feasible to make the page … yes, it's maybe causing some headaches, though ;) see: http://www.sagemath.org/spkg/huge/ I copied the three files, and the indexing worked fine.

[sage-devel] Re: Huge packages

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > do you think it is feasible to make the page … yes, it's maybe causing some headaches, though ;) see: http://www.sagemath.org/spkg/huge/ I copied the three files, and the indexing worked fine. It's just that there is no SPKG.txt in the spkg

[sage-devel] Speedup on GPU

Hello Sage-Devel Community! I am new to this maillist and thus wanted to ask the question whether it was considered to include support for Theano [1] or Numba [2] into SAGE? [1] http://deeplearning.net/software/theano/ [2] http://numba.pydata.org/ Thanks for the info and Greetings -- Ursin Solè

[sage-devel] Huge packages

Hararld, do you think it is feasible to make the page http://www.sagemath.org/sagedb/ look and function like http://www.sagemath.org/spkg/optional/ (possibly, there should be a .htaccess file pointing spkg/huge to http://www.sagemath.org/sagedb/) Somebody wants to add a new huge package: http

[sage-devel] Re: use Sage!

> > > How many copies do you need to be among the best-sellers for Springer? > Maybe 3,000? > How many copies of R are there, and how many people actually buy a book > to use free software? > How many would buy a bunch at US$65 each? > (Certainly some, but perhaps because the book teaches somet

[sage-devel] fixdoctests is broken in 5.9

The improvements to the doctesting framework made by trac:12415, which were merged in 5.9, have broken the fixdoctests command line option in sage: prompt> sage -fixdoctests partition.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/src/s

[sage-devel] Re: use Sage!

On Monday, May 6, 2013 2:00:43 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote: > 2. The author hopes to become famous (or gain tenure) from the book. Does that actually fly in Maths? In Physics the consent seems to be that writing a book counts against to your tenure evaluation, you'll be seen as not focused enough on r

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

On 06/05/13 17:24, Pong wrote: > Oh... I see. I am ignorant on what various flags mean. > > Let me summarize my problems and see if I get them right: > > 1) my gcc compiler confuses c and c++ programs. > 2) I want to solve 1) by forcing sage to use the gcc-4.7.2. but the > problem is that the cop

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 5.9 Fails to build in conway_polynomials

On 06/05/13 17:49, Johannes wrote: > Hi List, > I tried to upgrade sage via sage -upgrade but it fails in > conway_polynomials. > For more Details see attachment. > > On: > Linux neo 3.2.0-41-generic #65-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 10 18:23:37 UTC 2013 > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > Ubuntu 12.04 > For som

[sage-devel] Re: Composition of ring homomorphisms

This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14534 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: use Sage!

> Looks like Springer behaves in this market as Apple in personal > computers, charging more for reasons not always clear... Just for fun : http://www.springer.com/computer/theoretical+computer+science/book/978-3-642-14763-0 And I found this one yesterday : http://www.springer.com/statistics/stat