Ahaha, yea... Thanks Andrew. Sorry for the noise.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, February 14, 2014 4:43:25 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Travis Scrimshaw
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hey Andrew,
>>Thanks for fixing that. However I'm afraid I have another problem. On
Hello,
I have tried to resolve the issue. Any comments would be helpful.
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Never copy&paste code around. Just call gamma from factorial.
>
>
> On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:13:47 PM UTC, Amit Jamadagni wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
>Thanks for fixing that. However I'm afraid I have another problem. On
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15822, it's already showing the branch as
> being merged when it clearly has not.
>
Both branches that you put there
Hey Andrew,
Thanks for fixing that. However I'm afraid I have another problem.
On http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15822, it's already showing the branch
as being merged when it clearly has not.
Best,
Travis
On Friday, February 14, 2014 11:48:44 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Done, see ht
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Friday, February 14, 2014 7:57:09 AM UTC-8, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>
>> Also Octave, Scilab, or Freemat as various levels of free/Free
>> alternatives in differing ways compatible with Matlab. Octave is in Sage.
>
>
> It is,
Minor clarifica
On Friday, February 14, 2014 7:57:09 AM UTC-8, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Also Octave, Scilab, or Freemat as various levels of free/Free
> alternatives in differing ways compatible with Matlab. Octave is in Sage.
>
It is, but the sage-octave interface has a slight problem on exit:
sage: octave(1)
Done, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15819 for an example where the
branch was replaced by the final commit.
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:49:18 PM UTC, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> Volker: If you could have your closer script replace the branch field with
> the merged sha1, that would mak
Done, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15819 for an example where the
branch was replaced by the final commit.
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:49:18 PM UTC, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> Volker: If you could have your closer script replace the branch field with
> the merged sha1, that would mak
Hi,
I just opened a ticket on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15821#ticket
Aladin
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 6:50:01 PM UTC-8, Aladin VIRMAUX wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> here is a bug that is maybe related to coercion system to Integers in sage:
>
> sage: W = Words(4)
> sage: W([1,2])
See my answer to your ask.sagemath question for a workaround,
and http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10750
On Friday, February 14, 2014 6:10:03 AM UTC-5, Julius wrote:
>
> Hi, I've posted this question in ask.sagemath but maybe this is a better
> place. Sorry if this is an already known problem, bu
Hi
On 14 February 2014 17:46, rjf wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, Chris Gorman wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have know who is working on improving the numerical methods
>> in Sage? I am beginning my graduate program in numerical analysis and would
>> like to use Sage
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:26:50 AM UTC-8, Chris Gorman wrote:
>
> Does anyone have know who is working on improving the numerical methods in
> Sage? I am beginning my graduate program in numerical analysis and would
> like to use Sage for my work and research.
>
1. There are numerica
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Yes, fixed in a later version. See also http://trac.sagemath.org/15566
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 14, 2014 2:44:51 PM UTC, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> sage -syncbuild
>>>
Yes, fixed in a later version. See also http://trac.sagemath.org/15566
On Friday, February 14, 2014 2:44:51 PM UTC, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Volker Braun
>
> > wrote:
>
>> sage -syncbuild
>>
>>
>>
>
> ralf@ark:~/sage> ./sage -sync-build
> Traceback (most r
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> sage -syncbuild
>
>
>
ralf@ark:~/sage> ./sage -sync-build
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ralf/sage/src/bin/sage-sync-build.py", line 110, in
clean_tree(prune_directories=prune_directories, dry_run=dry_run)
File "/
Hi all,
Just FYI, I created a sage-cell mailing list for Sage Cell Server
development: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/sage-cell
Thanks,
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and st
Workaround for a relatively common failure on the buildbot:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15811
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsub
sage -syncbuild
On Friday, February 14, 2014 10:05:33 AM UTC, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> Hello,
> applying patches and then switching branches may be dangerous. I cannot
> get rid of py and pyc files that are regenerated in
> local/lib/python2.7/site-packages although the original py file from a
>
Hi, I've posted this question in ask.sagemath but maybe this is a better
place. Sorry if this is an already known problem, but solve(x*y, x, y)
returns only one of the two expected solutions.
Since maxima gives the right answer, I think the problem is somewhere
inside method solve in expression
Wow this was fast: 16h from the first report untill a positively revied
bugfix!
Thanks!!!
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014 01:36:27 UTC+1 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> Fix is at http://trac.sagemath.org/15819 (needs review)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello,
applying patches and then switching branches may be dangerous. I cannot get
rid of py and pyc files that are regenerated in
local/lib/python2.7/site-packages although the original py file from a
patch is no longer there. Is there a make target that can do this without a
full rebuild?
R
21 matches
Mail list logo
