On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 6:03:23 PM UTC+2, Chris Doris wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply, Jean-Pierre.
>
> I installed Cygwin from the x86_64 setup executable. Is this what you're
> calling Cygwin64?
>
> Do I take it that the Cygwin entry on the supported platforms wiki page is
> only referring
How to remove cplex in Ubuntu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-d
Hello everyone,
(see end for questions only)
I am currently writing a sampling of functions as c++ mini library I want
to be able to use in sage.
The target is a (preferable fast) implementation of mulders-storjohann to
compute the weak-popov-form of a matrix over a polynomial ring over a
finit
Python/Cython classes are not C++ classes, so you can't call Py/Cy methods
from C++ code directly. It can of course be done using the CPython C API or
Boost.Python, but a Python object is never a straight C++ object. For
starters it doesn't have a C++ vtable, methods can be added dynamically in
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Python/Cython classes are not C++ classes, so you can't call Py/Cy methods
> from C++ code directly. It can of course be done using the CPython C API or
> Boost.Python, but a Python object is never a straight C++ object. For
> starters it doesn
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 16:18:03 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> Python/Cython classes are not C++ classes, so you can't call Py/Cy methods
> from C++ code directly. It can of course be done using the CPython C API or
> Boost.Python, but a Python object is never a straight C++ object. For
>
IMHO its better to go with the first option. You essentially want to add a
single new method to matrices, it'll be easier to write and maintain to not
have to dig through a layer of Python->C++ indirection.
The linbox code of course uses the LinBox C++ matrix class. Then there is
always some s
On 2014-07-09, Mohammed hussein wrote:
> How to remove cplex in Ubuntu
what do you mean by this?
Removing a Sage binding to it as the default solver?
I believe removing links to .h and .so files and doing 'sage -b' after
this will do.
Uninstalling CPLEX from the system?
just remove the files...
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 17:27:21 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> IMHO its better to go with the first option. You essentially want to add a
> single new method to matrices, it'll be easier to write and maintain to not
> have to dig through a layer of Python->C++ indirection.
>
> The linbox c
I'm trying to help develop some code that a group is currently working on
using sage 5.11, and so I need to get a copy of that version of sage on my
laptop. There is no longer a binary file posted and so I need to install
through the source code. I know little about how these things work, and
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 10:56:44 AM UTC-7, robert@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm trying to help develop some code that a group is currently working on
> using sage 5.11, and so I need to get a copy of that version of sage on my
> laptop. There is no longer a binary file posted and so I need to
Hi,
Those of you who use SageTeX with emacs and, say, AUCTeX, may be annoyed
when you are editing sageblock environments because of the TeX-like
behavior. Here's a snippet you can use to make emacs use MMM (multiple
major modes) and treat your TeX like TeX, and your Sage code like Sage
code.
http
On Jul 9, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Those of you who use SageTeX with emacs and, say, AUCTeX, may be annoyed
> when you are editing sageblock environments because of the TeX-like
> behavior. Here's a snippet you can use to make emacs use MMM (multiple
> major modes) and treat
The first version that had 10.9 support was 5.13, although it should be as
simple as applying the patches and spkgs at [1] and [2] to get it to work
on 5.11.
Before any of this, you should work from a clean set of sage sources.
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/15433
[2] http://trac.sagemath.org/15937
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 01:03PM -0600, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> Sweet! Would you mind if I added it to sage-mode? There is already a
> sage-latex.el which does some AUCTeX specific setup. I would be
> willing to do it, or you can create a pull request (thereby getting
> credit).
I'll make a pull req
On Jul 9, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 01:03PM -0600, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> Sweet! Would you mind if I added it to sage-mode? There is already a
>> sage-latex.el which does some AUCTeX specific setup. I would be
>> willing to do it, or you can create a pull reque
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 02:26PM -0600, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> No problem! I munch elisp for breakfast. :-)
Well, parentheses do look a bit like cereal... :)
Here's the pull request, let me know what you think:
https://bitbucket.org/gvol/sage-mode/pull-request/5/add-mmm-support-to-sage-latexel/diff
Hello!
Today I noticed that the images embedded into the answer to my
question on ask.sagemath.org are not shown. I know for sure that these
images were present on that page before. I believe, they disappeared
after the Askbot version upgrade.
Here is the question I am talking about:
http://
Hello,
This should be fixed now.
--Mike
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
> Hello!
> Today I noticed that the images embedded into the answer to my
> question on ask.sagemath.org are not shown. I know for sure that these
> images were present on that page before. I believe, they disap
Hi all:
Following a suggestion of Steve Szabo, I've created a special
interest googlegroup called sage-coding-theory. Besides Steve Szabo,
other owners are Irene Marquez and Edgar Martinez-Moro. I hope is that
this group can provide extra support for GSOC projects in
coding theory and related topi
20 matches
Mail list logo
