[sage-devel] Sage grant

2014-10-28 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear All! Dan Bump, Ben Salisbury, Mark Shimozono and I are planning to apply for an NSF grant for Sage (to fund Sage Days and other Sage related activities). We will mostly focus on topics in combinatorics/algebra/ representation theory. It would be great to hear from you what your wishlists are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Volker Braun
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:02:11 PM UTC, Erik Massop wrote: > > P.S. Addition (concatenation) of sequences converts to lists. Is that > the intended behavior? I don't really want to hold up Sequence as the optimal implementation of a "coercing container", its just the only one that we hav

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Erik Massop
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Volker Braun wrote: > The language is explained here > > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_coercion.html#conversion-versus- coercion Thanks! > On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:06:44 PM UTC, Erik Massop wrote: > > > > sage: s = Sequence([], QQ) >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Volker Braun
The language is explained here http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_coercion.html#conversion-versus-coercion On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:06:44 PM UTC, Erik Massop wrote: > > sage: s = Sequence([], QQ) > sage: s.append(QQ(3)) # no coercion or conversion > sage: s.extend([int(1), ZZ(2)])

[sage-devel] Histogram plots ready for review

2014-10-28 Thread kcrisman
After an unending saga of many people not wanting to bother to wrap histograms, we now have yet another - but hopefully canonical - implementation. Hopefully people will want to review this, given there are quite a few relevant questions on http://ask.sagemath.org/questions/scope:all/sort:act

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Erik Massop
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:41:16 -0700 (PDT) Volker Braun wrote: > On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:16:47 PM UTC, Erik Massop wrote: > > > > class CoercingDict: > > def __init__(self, f): > > self.f = f > > self.data = dict() > > def __setitem__(self,

[sage-devel] determinant calculation, was: The Misfortunes of a Trio of Mathematicians [...]

2014-10-28 Thread Robert Dodier
On 2014-10-25, Jason Grout wrote: > http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf > P.S. It would be interesting to see if Sage can do the calculation they > identified as buggy in mathematica. That would make for a cool > follow-up editorial. I've reimplemnted the buggy determinant ca

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Volker Braun
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:16:47 PM UTC, Erik Massop wrote: > > class CoercingDict: > def __init__(self, f): > self.f = f > self.data = dict() > def __setitem__(self, key, value): > self.data[self.f(key)] = value Thats manua

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Erik Massop
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 05:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Volker Braun wrote: > But the most important thing is that caching must be 100% reliable, and > that means input must be really equal (at most up to some unique > isomorphism), and not just "equal enough". So either we make __eq__ much > stricter, or we

Re: [sage-devel] Reopening a closed ticket

2014-10-28 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/28/2014 09:33 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2014-10-28 14:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> Is it possible to reopen a closed ticket? #8005 was closed without a >> doctest, so I've added one. But now it won't let me change the status to >> needs_review again. >> > Open a new ticket instead. >

Re: [sage-devel] Reopening a closed ticket

2014-10-28 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-10-28 14:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Is it possible to reopen a closed ticket? #8005 was closed without a doctest, so I've added one. But now it won't let me change the status to needs_review again. Open a new ticket instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

[sage-devel] Reopening a closed ticket

2014-10-28 Thread Michael Orlitzky
Is it possible to reopen a closed ticket? #8005 was closed without a doctest, so I've added one. But now it won't let me change the status to needs_review again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and st

Re: [sage-devel] Re: __cmp__ vs. __eq__ in element class

2014-10-28 Thread Volker Braun
On Monday, October 27, 2014 10:45:40 PM UTC, Nils Bruin wrote: > > In general I expect that cached_methods should preprocess their arguments > a bit before doing a key lookup anyway (such as do the required coercions > on arguments). Most of the time, functions with arguments should *not* be > c

[sage-devel] Re: Can't compile sage on OS X 10.10

2014-10-28 Thread Volker Braun
See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/bHkz8Dwv5Mg/tQ4zIvGY4OIJ On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 11:08:53 AM UTC, Paul Mercat wrote: > > Hello ! > > I tried to compile the lastest development version of sage on my computer > with OS X 10.10, and I get the following very strange error : see c

[sage-devel] Can't compile sage on OS X 10.10

2014-10-28 Thread 'Paul Mercat' via sage-devel
Hello ! I tried to compile the lastest development version of sage on my computer with OS X 10.10, and I get the following very strange error : see config.log I precise that the C-compiler works on my computer : I have try to compile a small example to test it and it works. I hope somebody wil