[sage-devel] Review 17261

Hi Can someone review the following (small) ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17261 It's an enhancement for modular forms for hecke triangle groups. It adds support for coercions from form spaces/rings over the full modular group to form spaces/rings over the Theta subgroup. Best Jon

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Simon King wrote: > I guess a single ticket whose purpose is to add and fix all > documentation to the manual would be a nightmare to maintain. Wouldn't > it be easier to have one ticket for each module that is missing in the > documentation? Yes, it would! And I'm not planning to submit it all in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

On 28/02/2015, Simon King wrote: > I guess a single ticket whose purpose is to add and fix all > documentation to the manual would be a nightmare to maintain. Wouldn't > it be easier to have one ticket for each module that is missing in the > documentation? +1 And easier to review! But it would

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Hi! I guess a single ticket whose purpose is to add and fix all documentation to the manual would be a nightmare to maintain. Wouldn't it be easier to have one ticket for each module that is missing in the documentation? Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscrib

[sage-devel] Re: Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Vincent Delecroix wrote: > I already added sage/misc/sage_input.py in #17748 and Nathan added > combinat/permutations_cython.pyx in #17848. So it is highly probable > that your branch conflicts with the current and/or next beta Yes, I noticed. No problem, your sphinx-ifications are probably much

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Hi Marc, I already added sage/misc/sage_input.py in #17748 and Nathan added combinat/permutations_cython.pyx in #17848. So it is highly probable that your branch conflicts with the current and/or next beta. Vincent On 28/02/2015, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: >> Then clearly

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Then clearly the ticket #17876 is irrelevant. Not necessarily: I have no idea when (or if) I will be able to finish going through all missing modules, or even when I will have time to bring the existing part to a state where it can be reviewed without waiting for the r

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Hi Marc, Le samedi 28 février 2015 17:07:33 UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba a écrit : > > There are *tons* of modules missing from the reference manual, some > obsolete, some still in pre-sphinx style or with rst syntax errors, some > whose user documentation in fact appears in another module, and many

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > It seems that callable symbolic expressions, as implemented in > src/sage/symbolic/callable.py, > are not included in the reference manual: there is no mention of > sage/symbolic/callable in > src/doc/en/reference/calculus/index.rst > and they do not appear when asked for

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Le samedi 28 février 2015 15:57:21 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > > please do open a ticket! > > OK. This is #17876 (note that I've not pushed the correction yet). Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s

[sage-devel] Re: Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

please do open a ticket! On Saturday, February 28, 2015 at 3:29:12 PM UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems that callable symbolic expressions, as implemented in > src/sage/symbolic/callable.py, > are not included in the reference manual: there is no mention of > sage/symbolic/calla

[sage-devel] Callable symbolic expressions absent from the reference manual

Hi, It seems that callable symbolic expressions, as implemented in src/sage/symbolic/callable.py, are not included in the reference manual: there is no mention of sage/symbolic/callable in src/doc/en/reference/calculus/index.rst and they do not appear when asked for in the search box of the refer

Re: [sage-devel] sqrt(n) conversion/comparison

On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 7:58:24 PM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Friday, February 27, 2015 at 8:36:52 AM UTC-8, Ralf Stephan wrote: > >> Which of these do not use Maxima? >> > > You can figure that out by making sure that maxima doesn't work anymore: > Thanks. It appears to have nothin