[sage-devel] arando patchbot spam

Hello, this system is still spamming with wrong patchbot results: 6.6.beta5 Ubuntu/14.04/i686/3.13.0-40-generic/arando Please fix your system. Regards, -- You received this message because you

[sage-devel] Solved

Problem solved. On Yosemite 10.10.2, I have mac ports installed. The suggestions about alternative toolchains proved correct. Here's what I did: - Renamed my /opt to /_opt to remove it from any possible path, so that locally installed toolchain components cannot be used. - set PATH to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: We can now have pictures in our documentation

Cool. Any reason we couldn't just detect the standard plot() command in a PLOT section? On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hell, > >> - Can this be used to show pdf pictures obtained by (tikz) latex code? > > > HM O_o > > Well, not as it is right now. You should b

[sage-devel] Re: Interfacing Sage with a Java library (or thing)

Are there any examples of this being done in Sage currently with some Java code? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegrou

[sage-devel] Re: Interfacing Sage with a Java library (or thing)

On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 05:03:07 UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > Or do you have one particular java program that you want to call from > Python? This can be made 100% solid. Just write C/C++ JNI bindings for the > Java function that you want to call. Then access those bindings through > Cyth

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

No, "make distclean" is the official way to start from scratch (and a known starting point, namely just the source)... On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 12:33:49 AM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > Hmmm that's both encouraging and discouraging. I've already tried > 'make distclean' to start fre

Re: [sage-devel] Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Ditto here. I built 6.6.beta5 last evening just to see if I was hitting it myself. The error message about flat namespace is suggestive of an alternative toolchain interfering. Francois > On 19/03/2015, at 12:30, Volker Braun wrote: > > Same here. Also on 10.10.2 > > OSX osx 00:30:09 ~ > $ xc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Hmmm that's both encouraging and discouraging. I've already tried 'make distclean' to start fresh. Is there another way? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Same here. Also on 10.10.2 OSX osx 00:30:09 ~ $ xcode-select --version xcode-select version 2339. On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 12:22:16 AM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > It's possible... though I had just recompiled Sage 6.6beta4 last Thursday > without any issues. Here is my current output:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Okay, so it seems I cannot just run xcode-select --install to override the current version. $ xcode-select --install xcode-select: error: command line tools are already installed, use "Software Update" to install updates I looked at my Software Updates, and it seems that part of the update last

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

I have: $ xcode-select --version xcode-select version 2339. I am at Mac OS 10.10.2. Perhaps this is the issue? Andrew On Thursday, 19 March 2015 10:17:31 UTC+11, Volker Braun wrote: > > Do you perhaps have an older version of the command line tools installed? > It definitely works on my OSX Y

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

It's possible... though I had just recompiled Sage 6.6beta4 last Thursday without any issues. Here is my current output: $ xcode-select --version xcode-select version 2339. In the meantime, I will try to reinstall command line tools and recompile. My guess is that the problem has to do with th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Do you perhaps have an older version of the command line tools installed? It definitely works on my OSX Yosemite machine so it must be either some conflict with a system-wide install or a different toolchain version. On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 8:03:42 PM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

I do not have homebrew installed. $ brew help -bash: brew: command not found Best, Ben On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 11:52:20 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > Do you have Homebrew installed (stuff in /usr/local ?) > > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 7:44:10 PM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote: >> >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Do you have Homebrew installed (stuff in /usr/local ?) On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 7:44:10 PM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote: > > Hi, > > I did run "make distclean && make" during both failed builds. > > Best, > Ben > > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 11:39:48 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> T

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

Hi, I did run "make distclean && make" during both failed builds. Best, Ben On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 11:39:48 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > This looks like it ought to work. The thing I can think of is that we > install both a static and shared libgd, and if the linker ever used the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mac Yosemite build error conway_polynomials-0.4.p0

This looks like it ought to work. The thing I can think of is that we install both a static and shared libgd, and if the linker ever used the static version to resolve (part) of the dependencies then its going to be tough to figure out anything. Does "make distclean && make" change anything (wi

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

Hi! Thanks everyone for your input. We are banging hard on IntegerListLex at Sage Days 64, and hopefully will get a correct and as fast as previously implementation in the coming days. Don't hold your breath, but the point is that it's likely that the "non lex is faster" is only a temporar

[sage-devel] Re: Interfacing Sage with a Java library (or thing)

> > > Or do you have one particular java program that you want to call from > Python? This can be made 100% solid. Just write C/C++ JNI bindings for the > Java function that you want to call. Then access those bindings through > Cython. And launch the JVM from the Cython code. > I believe this

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

Hi, please don't make a distinction based on the n being less than 15! That would make a really bad pitfall. Best regards, Darij On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Viviane Pons wrote: > > > 2015-03-18 12:40 GMT+01:00 Mike Zabrocki : > >> That would make sense. My preference is that (at leas

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

2015-03-18 12:40 GMT+01:00 Mike Zabrocki : > That would make sense. My preference is that (at least for values less > than 15) the default is that the output is sorted and this can be > controlled by the optional parameter. > > I think about how many times that I test symmetric function identitie

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

On 2015-03-18 12:40, Mike Zabrocki wrote: (at least for values less than 15) I really don't like that defaults would depend on the input size. Somebody working with small examples might *assume* that the order is in a given way, and then suddenly his code will break down on larger examples. -

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

That would make sense. My preference is that (at least for values less than 15) the default is that the output is sorted and this can be controlled by the optional parameter. I think about how many times that I test symmetric function identities on partitions and realize that patterns that ind

[sage-devel] Re: libgap pickling

Hi Simon, Both IO and OpenMath packages are included in the GAP distribution. IO is under GPL3 and requires compilation, OpenMath is under GPL2 and need no compilation, but it requires IO. Best wishes, Alexander On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 8:38:45 AM UTC, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Ale

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: So would it make sense to have an optional parameter sorted=None, which one could set to 'lex' or 'revlex' to get them in a desired order. The documentation could warn about the issues you just raised. If there is a general agreement on this, I could

[sage-devel] Re: We can now have pictures in our documentation

Hell, - Can this be used to show pdf pictures obtained by (tikz) latex code? > HM O_o Well, not as it is right now. You should be able to plot anything that has some .plot command that works through matplotlib. If you can create a matplotlib object from a pdf file perhaps, but ther

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

On 2015-03-18 09:20, Samuel Lelievre wrote: So would it make sense to have an optional parameter sorted=None, which one could set to 'lex' or 'revlex' to get them in a desired order. The documentation could warn about the issues you just raised. If there is a general agreement on this, I could

[sage-devel] Re: Interfacing Sage with a Java library (or thing)

You want a generic interface where you can arbitrarily dig around in the JVM? This will probably crash a lot, depending on what you touch. Java is strongly typed so the JVM will have internal assumptions on types etc. Or do you have one particular java program that you want to call from Python?

[sage-devel] Re: libgap pickling

The IO package is here and GPLv3: http://gap-system.github.io/io/ Looks interesting but I haven't used it myself. I would also be interested in any advice/opinion on which approach is the most likely to work. On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 9:38:45 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Alexander!

[sage-devel] Re: libgap pickling

Hi Alexander! On 2015-03-17, Alexander Konovalov wrote: > This is an example of pickling using three different approaches: as string, > using pickling from IO package and using OpenMath package: Pickling from string does not always work. What is the status of the other two approaches? In parti

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Order of Partitions()

Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello, > > > I think that Partitions should be output in either lex (or possibly > reverse > > lex) since this order is compatible with dominance order. > > I only want to bring to your attention that deciding in which order > the partitions should be returned is not f