With Sage-6.6 there will also be the usual 32-bit builds again.
Our buildbot makes the binaries, and it would be great if we could increase
coverage. Buildbot also has support for libvirt to build/run virtual
machines, though we currently don't make use of it. Another possibility
would be to ru
Hi,
there is currenlty no 32-bits binary for 6.5 on the mirrors, and only a
single one for 6.4.1 that runs on an unmaintained Ubuntu release (13.04).
However, those are still needed for quite a lot of users i met (not only
users with old computers but also those that run i686 kernel on a 64 bits
m
Hello,
Any ideas how to work around the following bug? (Reported on
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18074 )
contour_plot(0, (0, 1), (0, 1)).show()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "_sage_input_177.py", line 10, in
exec compile(u'open("___code___.py","w").wri
I just tested a Sage 6.4.1 installation which has our latest Jmol/JSmol
combination. You have to give lots of permissions, but you can run Java
based Jmol in the notebook after clicking through all the warnings under
Mac 10.10.2. That said, most of the time the default JSmol is fine.
The comm
With which version of the patchbot ?
Le vendredi 27 mars 2015 16:18:39 UTC+1, Jakob Kroeker a écrit :
>
> Ticket 15056 is also interesting - try run it explicitly and one will get:
>
> Switched to branch 'patchbot/base'
> Already on 'patchbot/base'
> fatal: 'None' does not appear to be a git repos
Ticket 15056 is also interesting - try run it explicitly and one will get:
Switched to branch 'patchbot/base'
Already on 'patchbot/base'
fatal: 'None' does not appear to be a git repository
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Is that connected to the fact that in ticket 15056 the 'git_bran
>
> In my experience, at this point Java-based Jmol on OS X is a lost
> cause. It *was* working in OS X 10.something for me a few months ago
> embedded in sagenb.org, but now it doesn't. In fact, even the java
> applets at the Jmol website don't work for me in any browser, even
> with Java a
With much trepidation, I have introduced a (hopefully minor)
backward incompatibility into NTL.
The interface to the single-precision modular arithmetic
routines has been modified slightly.
This interface change allows for more flexible and more
efficient implementation of these routines,
which
new patchbot 2.3.1 released, please upgrade
sage -i http://chapoton.perso.math.cnrs.fr/patchbot-2.3.1.spkg
Frederic
Le vendredi 27 mars 2015 11:54:46 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> Hhrrm. Patchbot 2.3 seems to have a little problem right now, as it will
> probably never test
Volker was correct. Previously, when trying to run jmol, I received a
pop-up message saying I had to install the latest version of java, so I
did. However, this was not the JDK version of Java. I received a new
pop-up message when running
$ java -version
No Java runtime present, requesting i
Hello,
Hhrrm. Patchbot 2.3 seems to have a little problem right now, as it will
probably never test any ticket, because 'git' is not a trusted user..
Please wait for the next release before upgrading your patchbots.
Frédéric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
You need a newer java version (https://www.java.com/en/download/).
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 2:10:06 AM UTC+1, Ben Salisbury wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to view 3d objects (which I have been able to do in the past),
> but now I'm receiving the following error.
>
> sage: L = RootSystem(['A',
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:48:37 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2015-03-26 20:17, William Stein wrote:
> > Hi Sage Developers,
> >
> > We've posted the following message on the http://sagenb.org site:
> >
> > "This Sage notebook server will be shut down April 17, 2015.
>
> I am very
13 matches
Mail list logo