That's a very simple patch that one of us could apply. But in all
honesty I don't think it makes sense to add sub-releases like this.
The only thing that will fix the problems with gcc 5.x in the long run
is newer version of gf2x and ncurses that can deal with it out of the
box.
In that context I
Thanks, Anne, for your interest. I've never taught out of Artin, and my
copy is not here at home. But I'll say that Tom's book is very much like
Gallian's, which I used for many years. Tom has also used it for a
graduate course.
And there are a few Sage examples with a distinctly combinatori
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 12:59:54 PM UTC-7, parisse wrote:
>
> I had a quick look, but I'm still a little bit confused how the source are
> written. Do you write your source files in xml or have you some kind of
> converter from a latex source file?
>
MathBook XML is the "XML application" I
Hi William,
Le jeudi 30 juillet 2015 10:31:10 UTC-7, William a écrit :
>
> Hi People-who-might-care,
>
> There is going to be a small-ish Sage Days in Berkeley, CA (in Evans
> Hall) **November 9-13, 2015**. So far:
>
That's around the time I have to go back to France to get my Visa renewed
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 1:21:21 PM UTC-7, David Roe wrote:
>
> > Moreover, do we really want
> >
> > sage: log(QQ(8), 2).parent()
> > Integer Ring
>
> I would say yes. For rational x which is not a power of 2, log(x, 2)
> will end up in the symbolic ring. But we should avoid this if
>
Dear Rob,
This looks like a great book! I will be teaching Abstract Algebra at UC
Davis in the fall and will try to use
it (along with Artin's book). How does it compare to Artin "Algebra",
besides offering many Sage examples?
Best wishes,
Anne
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 6:32:36 PM UTC-7,
On 30/07/15 22:21, David Roe wrote:
Moreover, do we really want
sage: log(QQ(8), 2).parent()
Integer Ring
I would say yes. For rational x which is not a power of 2, log(x, 2)
will end up in the symbolic ring. But we should avoid this if
possible, and the only logs which are rational will act
> Moreover, do we really want
>
> sage: log(QQ(8), 2).parent()
> Integer Ring
I would say yes. For rational x which is not a power of 2, log(x, 2)
will end up in the symbolic ring. But we should avoid this if
possible, and the only logs which are rational will actually be
integral, so we might a
I had a quick look, but I'm still a little bit confused how the source are
written. Do you write your source files in xml or have you some kind of
converter from a latex source file?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
Hello leif,
I'm using gcc 5.2.0 under ArchLinux. Issues with ncurses and gf2x remain.
I've created and tested a patch (attached) to extend some of the existing
fixes for gcc 5.0 and 5.1.
A post at sage-support [1] might also be relevant.
Best,
Fidel
[1]: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage
Hi People-who-might-care,
There is going to be a small-ish Sage Days in Berkeley, CA (in Evans
Hall) **November 9-13, 2015**. So far:
- Harald Schilly and I will definitely be there
- Fernando Perez (IPython) and other IPython/Jupyter devs will be
there some of the time
- Ken Ribet (Berkeley
banned. deleted.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:12 AM, John williams wrote:
> Buy Quality Passport, Birth Cert, DL, ID card, SSN, Visas etc
> (centraldocume...@outlook.com)
> We use high quality equipements to produce fake, false, Passport, Identity
> card, SSN, Green cards , Counterfeits , Citizenshi
Buy Quality Passport, Birth Cert, DL, ID card, SSN, Visas etc
(centraldocume...@outlook.com)
We use high quality equipements to produce fake, false, Passport, Identity
card, SSN, Green cards , Counterfeits , Citizenship, Work permit ,resident
permit , citizen certificate , Birth Certificate , Di
Am 2015-07-30 um 09:42 schrieb Ralf Stephan:
> On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 9:30:51 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Martin wrote:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18970
> is ready for review.
I've commented on timing-issues on the ticket.
Moreover, do we really want
sage: log(QQ(8), 2).parent()
Integer Ring
On Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 9:30:51 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Martin wrote:
>
> Yes, but if the user knows in advance that the answer will be an integer -
> as I did - then it makes sense to use valuation() instead of log(), and a
> carefully worded note to that effect in the documentation could be very
15 matches
Mail list logo
