Re: [sage-devel] Re: Do we really need Element, RingElement, AdditiveGroupElement, ...?

2015-11-27 Thread Jonas Jermann
Hi In one case I was forced to use CommutativeAlgebraElement because I needed it's operations (e.g. __mul__) even though the category/class from the parent (module) doesn't support it: It sometimes makes sense to view (homogeneous) elements of a graded ring as module elements (because operations

[sage-devel] Re: Have not got my trac account

2015-11-27 Thread Ninad Bhat
Thank you very much Nathann, Would me my pleasure help with the workload after I get used to trac. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel

[sage-devel] Re: Have not got my trac account

2015-11-27 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello, I had emailed my details to sage-trac-account @googlegroups.com on > Sunday, Nov 22.But, I still haven't got a trac account.Does it usually take > this much time? > It is done manually by some of us. Sometimes, everybody expects the others to do it, and the accounts are not created.

[sage-devel] Re: Mathematics without apologies - Portrait of a Problematical Vocation

2015-11-27 Thread Henri Girard
They aren't the only ones to get paid for doing pleasure ! Politicians are...and well paied... I had to wait for retirement for doing my pleasure :) Le mercredi 25 novembre 2015 19:18:51 UTC+1, rjf a écrit : > > This is a new book by Michael Harris. > > I have not read it, but there is an extensi

[sage-devel] Re: Do we really need Element, RingElement, AdditiveGroupElement, ...?

2015-11-27 Thread Simon King
Hi Jeroen, On 2015-11-26, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> On 2015-11-23, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >>> However, I'm +1 for flatting things down to Element as it would probably >>> solve #15160 and #15947 >>> . >> >> See #18756

Re: [sage-devel] Re: install_package('whatever')

2015-11-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-11-27 09:06, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: And server_pool makes it impossible to have %cython cells. By the way, this is https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/issues/260 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: install_package('whatever')

2015-11-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-11-27 11:16, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: And server_pool makes it impossible to have %cython cells. As a workaround, doing cython(""" # Cython code here """) does work. Great! Somebody please document this. Or somebody fix %cython (one can w

Re: [sage-devel] Re: install_package('whatever')

2015-11-27 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: And server_pool makes it impossible to have %cython cells. As a workaround, doing cython(""" # Cython code here """) does work. Great! Somebody please document this. That could be part of "Sagemath perfomance tips" with Nathann Cohen's suggestio

Re: [sage-devel] Re: install_package('whatever')

2015-11-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-11-27 09:06, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: And server_pool makes it impossible to have %cython cells. As a workaround, doing cython(""" # Cython code here """) does work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from thi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: install_package('whatever')

2015-11-27 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Volker Braun wrote: The question was about the default notebook; We aren't going to remove SageNB any time soon but for most users its not a good match. Also, jupyter also has multiuser stuff (though not packaged in Sage), and a better implementation thereof thats not totall