Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

Actually there is a funny bit of cut and paste in configure.ac that I didn’t pass upstream: https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/commit/2f379a5b732c40547c2c06e915111efa3d881b8d you cannot pass “—without-gmp” or “—with-gmp=no” and expect it to have an effect if gmp/mpir is present. Someone has

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

> Can someone confirm this? With bliss installed Works for me too. But what you report is a bug with which we fought hard in the past already: do you use the latest beta and the latest version of bliss? Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-

Re: [sage-devel] Bliss bug?

Do you have a bit more of that backtrace. In sage-on-gentoo with bliss enabled: fbissey@QCD-nzi3 ~ $ sage ┌┐ │ SageMath Version 6.10.rc0, Release Date: 2015-12-09│ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook

[sage-devel] Bliss bug?

Can someone confirm this? With bliss installed points = [(1,0,0), (0,1,0), (0,0,1), (0,0,0), (1,1,0), (1,0,1), (0,1,1), (1,1,1)] p = LatticePolytope(points) p.face_lattice().canonical_label() python: graph.cc:3876: virtual bool bliss::Digraph::nucr_find_first_component(unsigned int, std::vector

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

On 12/11/2015 08:51 AM, Volker Braun wrote: Copy&paste from pdf is generally troublesome, anything thats not just letter+number is likely to cough up unicode stuff. Yep, and that's why I've been super-careful about the PDF's produced from MathBook XML. Left, right, single, double quotes, and

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 5:13:18 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> 3*(z+1)*(z-i)ˆ2*(z-1+i)ˆ3 >> won't quite work. Instead do > > > On the plus side its somewhat unlikely that one would enter U+02C6 > accidentally instead of ^ I did th

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 5:13:18 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > 3*(z+1)*(z-i)ˆ2*(z-1+i)ˆ3 > won't quite work. Instead do > On the plus side its somewhat unlikely that one would enter U+02C6 accidentally instead of ^ Copy&paste from pdf is generally troublesome, anything thats not jus

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Friday, 11 December 2015 14:09:03 UTC, kcrisman wrote: >> >> http://www.ams.org/notices/201511/rnoti-p1350.pdf >> >> Especially thanks to Robert Bradshaw for first introducing this in >> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5606 ! That's

[sage-devel] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

> >> (Harald, can you add this book review to the references? It cites both >> Sage and its documentation.) >> > > FYI, adding references is done via github pull requests at > https://github.com/sagemath/publications :-) > Yes, I know... but among other things, I'm not sure how to cite it,

[sage-devel] Re: Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

On Friday, 11 December 2015 14:09:03 UTC, kcrisman wrote: > > http://www.ams.org/notices/201511/rnoti-p1350.pdf > > Especially thanks to Robert Bradshaw for first introducing this in > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5606 ! > > (Harald, can you add this book review to the references? It cites b

[sage-devel] Article with beautiful math and pictures by SageMath in Notices

http://www.ams.org/notices/201511/rnoti-p1350.pdf Especially thanks to Robert Bradshaw for first introducing this in http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5606 ! (Harald, can you add this book review to the references? It cites both Sage and its documentation.) -- You received this message because

[sage-devel] SageManifolds 0.9 released

Hi, The version 0.9 of SageManifolds has just been released at http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/ As mentioned in this previous post , this release is based on the reorganization of the code for its submission to Sage, through #18528