On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 10:40:23 PM UTC-10, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 5:16:44 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> different notebook. We could possibly alleviate the problem of lack of
>> information by somehow guessing if this is the first time this user
Oups, I wanted to post this on sage-devel. Sorry.
Sébastien
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 10:30:10 PM UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> Hello patchbot developers,
>
> At http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/13580/, before the doctest
> continuation problem was fixed, the patchbot was
Hello,
this may be caused by the fact that currently the "develop" branch is 6.10,
which is also "base", ie not a beta release. The patchbot
has some troubles every time one reaches this situation. You can probably
safely ignore it. Having a green light is not mandatory, and the bot is
only
Hello,
this may be caused by the fact that currently the "develop" branch is 6.10,
which is also "base", ie not a beta release. The patchbot
has some troubles every time one reaches this situation. You can probably
safely ignore it. Having a green light is not mandatory, and the bot is
only
Hi sage-devel,
I think 1) should be the default but I find myself needing 2) quite a
bit these days (also for integers)
Cheers,
Martin
Vincent Delecroix writes:
> Hello,
>
> While responding to this ask question
>
> http://ask.sagemath.org/question/31740/why-112321-and-111320
>
> I discovered
On 2015-12-22 00:31, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> 1) the unique x' between [0,y) of the form x + ny (used when both x
> and y are integers)
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
I discovered some inconsistencies with the modulo operators in Sage. We
indeed have three coexisting definitions for x % y
1) the unique x' between [0,y) of the form x + ny (used when both x and y
are integers)
2) the unique x' between (-y/2,
On 2015-12-22 09:59, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
Other option would be to remove it for non-integer arguments.
-1
Modulo can be useful for floating-point numbers and it makes sense
mathematically.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
On Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9:16:55 PM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> We could make the UX more consistent by "preinstalling" a migration ipy
> notebook.
>
Into which directory are we going to put that MigrateFromSagenb.ipynb file?
> In fact, that notebook could include code to open and
