Thanks everybody -- that was extremely helpful!
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Francois Bissey
wrote:
>
>> On 31/12/2015, at 09:31, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> There isn't an easy way to "delete everything thats not needed in a
>> system-wide install". Ideally you should only need the "sage" s
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 at 11:26:29 AM UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> May I inquire why you want to use sage-mode (0.6) rather than sage_mode
> (0.14) ?
>
Nobody wants the ancient sage-mode, its just that an easy-to-make typo
installs a broken package which nobody wants. Its a to
That is a good point. Although it is getting harder to have testing
platforms. I have access to around half a dozen different computers that I
could use for testing, and I was surprised to realize that none of them is
32 bits.
At least we can still rely on virtual machines.
El jueves, 31 de di
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Isn't it an indicator of bad code quality if the software works in
32-bit but not in 64-bit or vice versa?
Of course it is. So I think it's a valid reason to move those packages to
"experimental".
And an indirect reason to not drop support for 32-b
On 2015-12-31 10:57, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
Isn't it an indicator of bad code quality if the software works in
32-bit but not in 64-bit or vice versa?
Of course it is. So I think it's a valid reason to move those packages
to "experimental".
--
You received this message because you are subscri
Dear Anne,
Le lundi 28 décembre 2015 02:25:15 UTC+1, Anne Schilling a écrit :
>
> Also, how do I now install old packages that I still need? For example
>
> sage -i sage-mode
>
> does not work.
>
May I inquire why you want to use sage-mode (0.6) rather than sage_mode
(0.14) ?
The only striking
Isn't it an indicator of bad code quality if the software works in 32-bit
but not in 64-bit or vice versa?
just my two cents...
--
Jori Mäntysalo
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 at 2:43:56 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Regardless of how "useful" or awesome the Jupyter notebook is and how many
> people in scientific computing are using it, there is a substantial
> ecosystem now designed around the Sage notebook proper
>
And we are not remov
