Hi I'm Dilshan Pathirana Currently a final year undergraduate of University
Moratuwa Faculy of Engineering in Department of Computer Science and
Engineering.I always use OpenSource Projects and thought of starting to
contribute for a project as a help for others.I'm passionated in
java,Maths,C,
worked for me - so I set it to positive review on your behalf, quoting this
post
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 1:32:31 PM UTC, Clemens Heuberger wrote:
>
> I'd like to set #19423 to positive_review, but cannot do so due to a trac
> timeout. I left the comment field empty.
>
> I can open trac t
I'd like to set #19423 to positive_review, but cannot do so due to a trac
timeout. I left the comment field empty.
I can open trac ticket pages without problems, so it is a problem just with
post.
Regards,
Clemens
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
> Did you run "make" before running "./sage --docbuild..."?
I thought that I had, and running 'make' did not produce any
significant output, but it indeed solved my problem. Sorry for the
noise and thanks for the help O_o
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
On 2016-02-08 13:31, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody,
I installed a fresh Sage on a new computer, and I get a weird message
when trying to build the doc:
~$ sage -docbuild reference/graphs html
/home/ncohen/.Sage/local/bin/python: No module named interrupt;
'sage_setup.docbuild' is
Hello everybody,
I installed a fresh Sage on a new computer, and I get a weird message
when trying to build the doc:
~$ sage -docbuild reference/graphs html
/home/ncohen/.Sage/local/bin/python: No module named interrupt;
'sage_setup.docbuild' is a package and cannot be directly executed
It
We could also have a particular print_order that is used for sorting sets
and dictionary keys in output.
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 11:40:32 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 8 February 2016 at 10:13, David Loeffler > wrote:
> >
> > On 6 February 2016 at 22:48, Volker Braun > wrote:
On 8 February 2016 at 10:13, David Loeffler wrote:
>
> On 6 February 2016 at 22:48, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> So as long as the elements are sortable a set is just as good as a list
>> for doctests purposes.
>
>
>
> Isn't that the whole point of this discussion: that number field elements
> are p
On 6 February 2016 at 22:48, Volker Braun wrote:
> So as long as the elements are sortable a set is just as good as a list
> for doctests purposes.
Isn't that the whole point of this discussion: that number field elements
are presently *not* sortable, in any consistent and reliable way?
David
Dear sage-devel,
several students are emailing sage-gsoc to look for mentors.
Would those of you who have time take a look:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sage-gsoc
Best,
Samuel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubs
10 matches
Mail list logo
