[sage-devel] Re: lu decomposition

2016-03-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
what is the output you get? I can't reproduce this: sage: A.LU() ( [1 0 0 0] [1 0 0 0] [ 1 1 0 -1 -1] [0 1 0 0] [0 1 0 0] [ 0 1 1 -1 1] [0 0 1 0] [0 0 1 0] [ 0 0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 1], [0 0 0 1], [ 0 0 0 0 2] ) On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 4:53:27 PM UTC, ea42_...@mail.com wrote: > >

[sage-devel] lu decomposition

2016-03-06 Thread ea42_github
A=matrix(QQ,[[ 1, 1, 0, -1, -1 ], [ 0, 1, 1, -1, 1 ], [ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ], [ 0, 0, 0, 0, 2 ]]) A.LU() results in U not in row echelon form 'SageMath Version 7.0, Release Date: 2016-01-19' -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

[sage-devel] Re: Weber polynomials

2016-03-06 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Old ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11807 There is no bindings there though. Maybe there is another ticket with bindings... And it is an old style spkg. On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:26:36 AM UTC+1, David Kohel wrote: > > Hi, > > To extend beyond a pre-computed database, I suggest linking

Re: [sage-devel] configure error

2016-03-06 Thread John Cremona
Thanks both. I had forgotten about no incremental builds since it's so long since I went up to 7.0 on my main development machines. John On 6 Mar 2016 11:04 am, "Jeroen Demeyer" wrote: > On 2016-03-06 11:23, John Cremona wrote: > >> I seemed to remember that form 7.0 one must now >> do "./config

Re: [sage-devel] configure error

2016-03-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-03-06 11:23, John Cremona wrote: I seemed to remember that form 7.0 one must now do "./configure" before "make" That's not actually true. Running ./configure before make is optional. But if you do run ./configure, you need to ensure that configure itself is up-to-date. So you really n

[sage-devel] Query about SageMath for GSOC

2016-03-06 Thread Amritpal Singh
Hello developers, I'm an enthusiast user of SageMath, using sage for purpose doesn't satisfy me, so now I want to contribute in coming GSOC 2016. As you, all know that Sage have no functionality to prints all the steps that how this particular equation is solved. It gives the exact solution of a

[sage-devel] Re: configure error

2016-03-06 Thread Volker Braun
There are no incremental updates from 6.x to 7.x. Erase all artifacts, "make distclean" or git clean On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 11:24:23 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > I was upgrading Sage on my quite old laptop (running ubuntu 14.04), > from 6.10 to 7.0. (One reason for doing thst is that

[sage-devel] configure error

2016-03-06 Thread John Cremona
I was upgrading Sage on my quite old laptop (running ubuntu 14.04), from 6.10 to 7.0. (One reason for doing thst is that this is a 32-bit system and that seems to be a rarity now). After the usual "git pull trac master" I seemed to remember that form 7.0 one must now do "./configure" before "mak

[sage-devel] Re: Weber polynomials

2016-03-06 Thread David Kohel
Hi, To extend beyond a pre-computed database, I suggest linking the cm library of Andreas Enge: http://www.multiprecision.org/index.php?prog=cm Pari has implementation of the weber function, but I think this (cm) should be the reference implementation, in the framework of standard mpc/mpfr lib