Re: [sage-devel] NTL 9.7.0

2016-03-12 Thread Francois Bissey
Thanks for adding a way to make binaries without avx/fma. The threading unfortunately requires C++11 (unless it changed). In turns the inclusion of c++11 flags breaks the building of the singular version shipped in sage. I don’t know about singular 4 but it wouldn’t surprise me if it did too. F

[sage-devel] NTL 9.7.0

2016-03-12 Thread Victor Shoup
Just released a new version of NTL! In a nutshell: faster, better matrix arithmetic over zz_p (small moduli), some improved thread pooling facilities, and several other small improvements. For more details, go here: http://shoup.net/ntl/doc/tour-changes.html -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-12 Thread Volker Braun
I use hashdist outside of Sage on a daily basis, and its promise of "never compile anything twice" really works. It does bulletproof incremental builds, and the dependency tracking works very well in practice. If it weren't for distributing binary builds of Sage we should be using hashdist rig

Re: [sage-devel] Query about SageMath for GSOC

2016-03-12 Thread Amritpal Singh
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > See the following list of suggested projects that a dev is ready to > mentor: > > https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2016 > > I'm on the project "Rank-metric codes" which has already received lots > of attention from prospective students.

Re: [sage-devel] Query about SageMath for GSOC

2016-03-12 Thread Johan S . R . Nielsen
> Can you tell me some top priority projects of Sage for GSoC in which > you can guide me? See the following list of suggested projects that a dev is ready to mentor: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2016 I'm on the project "Rank-metric codes" which has already received lots of attention from pros