Re: [sage-devel] Relocating Sage

2016-03-20 Thread Volker Braun
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 12:53:54 AM UTC+1, William wrote: > > I did *NOT* say that SMC does not using cgroups.The are several > distinct concepts here: > >- cgroups >- docker containers >- lxc >- chroot > > Please don't conflate them. > Well until not so long ago

Re: [sage-devel] Relocating Sage

2016-03-20 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 10:40:56 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> That doesn't work since SMC uses normal Linux users, not lxc or docker >> containers, so they do not have a virtual chroot'd filesystem. > > > Well

Re: [sage-devel] Relocating Sage

2016-03-20 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 9:40:56 PM UTC, William wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Volker Braun wrote: >> > On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 6:39:33 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Relocating Sage

2016-03-20 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 at 10:40:56 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > That doesn't work since SMC uses normal Linux users, not lxc or docker > containers, so they do not have a virtual chroot'd filesystem. > Well that explains why massive parallel compilation can grind everything to a halt;

Re: [sage-devel] Relocating Sage

2016-03-20 Thread David Roe
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 5:06:59 PM UTC, David Roe wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Dima Pasechnik >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 3:06:04 PM UTC,

Re: [sage-devel] Relocating Sage

2016-03-20 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 6:39:33 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > 3. More generally, for SMC, it's useful, for the sake of Sage > development, to have a way to setup a sage dev environment as quickly > as possible for user experience reasons, and as efficiently as > possible to better make use

Re: [sage-devel] mails from trac marked as spam?

2016-03-20 Thread Thierry
Hi, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 03:39:40PM +0100, Daniel Krenn wrote: > On 2016-03-18 14:55, Harald Schilly wrote: > > I have no idea about trac's email setup, can you forward me the source > > code of one of such emails? My guess is, that it doesn't properly sign > > the email, etc. > > The

[sage-devel] Optional package for GAP3 reloaded

2016-03-20 Thread Christian Stump
Dear all, I have provided a new version of an optional package for GAP3 at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20107 . I would be glad if some people could try to install as I only tested it on a 64bit linux machine; so both 32bit and osx installations would be appreciated! Beside that, also more