On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 7:12:59 AM UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> Dear Brian,
>
> Appears it is some flavor of Ubuntu Linux running within Windows?
>
>
> https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2016/03/30/run-bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows/
>
> right.
https://github.com/Microsoft/BashOnWindows
I
Dear Brian,
Appears it is some flavor of Ubuntu Linux running within Windows?
https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2016/03/30/run-bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows/
I hadn't heard. ;-)
Rob
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscr
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 10:48:10 PM UTC+2, mmarco wrote:
>
> Thanks for the answer. So you propose that Expression.polynomial() should
> return either a polynomial or a laurent polynomial depending on the
> expression?
>
Depending on expression and ring argument:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: S = L
Thanks for the answer. So you propose that Expression.polynomial() should
return either a polynomial or a laurent polynomial depending on the
expression?
El martes, 10 de mayo de 2016, 20:35:24 (UTC+2), Ralf Stephan escribió:
>
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 2:40:02 PM UTC+2, mmarco wrote:
> > Righ
>
> We don't have a buildbot on old OSX machines.
>
One possible idea: VirtualBox supports running OS X clients on OS X hosts,
and the OS X versions don't have to match. I know someone who has VB VM's
of every release from 10.6 to 10.11 running on a 10.11 host.
Nathan
--
You received thi
We don't have a buildbot on old OSX machines. If you are willing to host
one then it would be easy to build binaries.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Currently, the only OS X binaries available on the official SageMath site
are labeled as being for OS X 10.11 (El Capitan) only, with names like
"sage-7.1-OSX_10.11.3-x86_64*". My question is: shouldn't there versions
for older versions of OS X? El Capitan is less than 7 months old, and Sage
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 2:40:02 PM UTC+2, mmarco wrote:
> Right now Sage can convert seamlessly between polynomial rings and symbolic
> ring. I am trying to extend this ability to Laurent polynomial rings.
>
>
> I have already worked out the conversion to symbolic ring, by defining a
> method
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 9:48:01 PM UTC-7, saad khalid wrote:
>
>
> Another issue is whether this would even be useful at all, to add this
> option within sum. I'm assuming there are other situations in which the
> bessel function appears as output apart from just the sum function? If
> that's
I've tried searching on the sage trac and haven't found any open tickets
about adding 3d axes labels, so I wanted to check if anyone knows about an
outstanding ticket number regarding said labeling functionality? Also, I
just wanted to double check here about whether or not the frame option for
This is in a part of sage that I never use so I am not qualified to comment
on what is best usage (and I don't really care:), but changing the default
behaviour of a function or method should not really be done without some
form of depreciation warning, so you probably should look at
`Deprecate
11 matches
Mail list logo
