Hi,
I was wondering... So, I have my local install of Sage 7.1 from source. I
> didn't get the source using git, I downloaded it from the website. I've
> made a local repository for Sage on my computer, and also made a remote
> repository for it on my github. However, I don't think it is connec
Please see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20461
Comments welcome.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Hi,
> Matthias Koeppe did a lot of work on MILPs recently, in particular on
> copying LPs, see e.g.
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20414
> and the meta-ticket http://trac
>
>
> var('x')
> R=LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ,'x')
> R(1+1/x)
>
>
That is the interface that makes sense to me. That is, enable conversion.
So, would it make sense to enable it by a `convert_method_name` ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel
> So, what is the proper way to do it? As I wrote, it's not really an
>> option to solve the whole problem for each new constraint...
>>
>
> add a constraint, and solve again?
>
> Yes, and then? I don't think I can remove it again, can I? As I wrote,
pseudo-code is as follows, and keep in mi
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC+1, Martin R wrote:
>
> So, what is the proper way to do it? As I wrote, it's not really an
> option to solve the whole problem for each new constraint...
>
add a constraint, and solve again?
Dima
>
> Martin
>
--
You received this message because
So, what is the proper way to do it? As I wrote, it's not really an option
to solve the whole problem for each new constraint...
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 4:56:54 AM UTC-7, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM mmarco >
> wrote:
>
>> But even if we implement expression.laurent_polynomial(), it wouldn't
>> automatically allow conversion from SR to LaurentPolynomialRing, would it?
>>
>
> Right, it's con
On 2016-05-12 15:32, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Hi,
The point is that you are not able anymore to use variables from other
problems.
For good reasons obviously...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Hi,
The point is that you are not able anymore to use variables from other
problems. Namely "assignment" is a variable from "p" not "p_new".
Vincent
On 12/05/16 02:18, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
Hi there!
I am having a severe problem with a program of mine that stopped working,
very l
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM mmarco wrote:
> But even if we implement expression.laurent_polynomial(), it wouldn't
> automatically allow conversion from SR to LaurentPolynomialRing, would it?
>
Right, it's conversion on demand.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Many warning messages are currently being issued every time the
offending code is being run, instead of only the first time:
sage: C = codes.RandomLinearCode(4, 2, GF(2))
sage: C.decode(C.ambient_space().random_element())
/home/jsrn/local/sage/sage-6.3/src/bin/sage-ipython:1: Deprecati
Sorry for the stupid question - I did not realize that some old sources are
to be found among the new sources :)
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an ema
Thanks for the suggestions, I will try to do that. In the meantime, I tried
7.1 on a machine with 100G of RAM. Now it works, but it costs me 4.3 G of
RAM the first time round - that is the same calculation which used 1G in
7.0. Re-running it a few times with or without clobbering BIG - I am not
But even if we implement expression.laurent_polynomial(), it wouldn't
automatically allow conversion from SR to LaurentPolynomialRing, would it?
We would need to populate the conversion list somehow.
El jueves, 12 de mayo de 2016, 5:33:50 (UTC+2), Ralf Stephan escribió:
>
> Then making it Expres
Hi,
Matthias Koeppe did a lot of work on MILPs recently, in particular on
copying LPs, see e.g.
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20414
and the meta-ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20302
Not sure whether he reads this, I cc to him.
I presume you got one of these updates messing up your code.
The developer guide has a lot of material about git:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 7:06:36 AM UTC+2, saad khalid wrote:
>
> Hey guys:
>
> I was wondering... So, I have my local install of Sage 7.1 from source. I
> didn't get the source using
Hi there!
I am having a severe problem with a program of mine that stopped working,
very likely after upgrading to 7.2.beta5, but I'm afraid I don't know from
which version. (I believe something after 7.1)
The error I get is:
ValueError: Variable MIPVariable of dimension 1 is a variable from
17 matches
Mail list logo