Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

Well, maybe history for the js folder would be better: https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/commits/master/js Is there some console for iOS that shows what's wrong or at least where things get stuck? Current version is very verbose in terms of logging, you should be able to see all messages

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

On May 26, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > I got a report that iOS app using SageMathCell is broken and I imagine the > same is true for Android. Can someone look into updating them? This commit > may be helpful in figuring out what to do: >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On May 26, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > On Thursday, 26 May 2016 10:34:07 UTC-6, kcrisman wrote: > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/33555/problem-with-encoding-german-characters/ > >

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

On Thursday, 26 May 2016 10:34:07 UTC-6, kcrisman wrote: > > > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/33555/problem-with-encoding-german-characters/ > > could be related, or so the poster seems to imply - though probably not bad > enough to go back before 7.2. > Thanks a lot for pointing it out -

[sage-devel] removing documentation/interfaces for obsolete packages?

There are packages that are obsolete, e.g. frobby, which does not build anymore (you'd need to download the spkg file to try), yet one can see docs like http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/interfaces/sage/interfaces/frobby.html Well, frobby is not too hard to fix, I suppose. But there

Re: [sage-devel] NTL new.h patch - singular-related - details?

On 05/27/16 02:55, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive... I think inspection of #852 is fairly conclusive although the final word on the matter would rest on singular devs as they are the one the patch was stolen from.

[sage-devel] Re: Integration of Trac and Github

If you search the Trac database for users github/matsen and github/switzel and compare the results with open pull requests, the integration appears to have stopped working in the middle of 2015. On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 6:43:28 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote: > > > The developer's walkthrough

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

> Please report any new (or old) errors that you notice - I will try to > fix them tomorrow (Saturday) afternoon (MST) and on Sunday/Monday. If > something is horribly wrong and I can't resolve it by Monday evening, > I'll pull back to the old version. > >

[sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

I got a report that iOS app using SageMathCell is broken and I imagine the same is true for Android. Can someone look into updating them? This commit may be helpful in figuring out what to do: https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/commit/9878eadc0b6f9959388549e21d8f7945e94f00b2 Thank you! Andrey

Re: [sage-devel] NTL new.h patch - singular-related - details?

I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive... By the way, I've forwarded all of our patches/hackery to Victor Shoup some monthes/years ago and he said he'll try to integrate them. Maybe it's time to politely ask once again about what has not been integrated (e.g.

Re: [sage-devel] Copyrights

On Thu, 26 May 2016, Erik Bray wrote: Thanks, I saw that. I don't want to "(C) My Name" though. Is there a more generic entity I can use? The point here is kind of reversed: You don't give away you copyrights. You explicitly announce your ownership to code and give all others permission

Re: [sage-devel] Copyrights

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: >> On 2016-05-26 12:16, Erik Bray wrote: >>> >>> So my question is, what should I put in a new file? >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Copyrights

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-05-26 12:16, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> So my question is, what should I put in a new file? > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_basics.html#headings-of-sage-library-code-files Thanks, I saw

Re: [sage-devel] Copyrights

On 2016-05-26 12:16, Erik Bray wrote: So my question is, what should I put in a new file? http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_basics.html#headings-of-sage-library-code-files -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

[sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

There is no contributor license agreement. Every file must be GPLv2+ licensed. If you start a new file you have copyright on that module whether you put your name in there or not; But we need the GPLv2+ statement to distribute it as part of Sage. On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM

[sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Erik Bray wrote: > Hi, > > I am not a lawyer, I don't pretend to be a lawyer, nor do I even > pretend like I know anything about copyrights or licenses beyond what > I can read on Wikipedia. > > So I'm very confused about the policy for

[sage-devel] Copyrights

Hi, I am not a lawyer, I don't pretend to be a lawyer, nor do I even pretend like I know anything about copyrights or licenses beyond what I can read on Wikipedia. So I'm very confused about the policy for copyrighting any work I contribute to sage. I would like to add a new file to sage--I've

Re: [sage-devel] NTL new.h patch - singular-related - details?

That’s old… After digging it looks like the first version of this is from #852. https://github.com/sagemath/sage/commit/02f6f87b554a6abebc9963076a00b7a48a4580b6 François > On 26/05/2016, at 21:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > There is build/pkgs/ntl/patches/new_singular.patch

[sage-devel] NTL new.h patch - singular-related - details?

There is build/pkgs/ntl/patches/new_singular.patch that changes a macro (expanding to new rather than to new(std::nothrow)), and it is said to be related to Singular, without details or a link to a trac ticket. Where can I read more on this? Thanks, Dima -- You received this message because