[sage-devel] Re: Evaluation of beta() in Sage 7.2

2016-06-13 Thread Ralf Stephan
I get this both in 7.1 and 7.3beta4: sage: x=.9 sage: y=.1 sage: gamma(x)*gamma(y)/gamma(x+y) 10.1664073846305 sage: beta(x,y) 10.1664073846305 On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 5:21:11 AM UTC+2, Paul Masson wrote: > > Came across this error in attempting to plot beta(x,y) as a function of > *x

[sage-devel] Evaluation of beta() in Sage 7.2

2016-06-13 Thread Paul Masson
Came across this error in attempting to plot beta(x,y) as a function of *x* for a given *y*, which sometimes produced results and more often failed with the message "When plotting, failed to evaluate function at 200 points". Here's an example of the problem: sage: x=-.9 sage: y=.1 sage: gamma

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-06-13 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
On Monday, 13 June 2016 14:58:54 UTC-6, Paul Masson wrote: > > If the error occurs in Mobile Safari, then it's not an issure with the app > but with the browser in general, since the app is basically an iOS > UIWebView. > > The only major change made to the web server was adding require.js, right

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Re: http://trac.sagemath.org vs https://trac.sagemath.org

2016-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Btw when I go to http://sagemathcloud.com then I'm greeted by a cloudflare > Error 521 page, presumably this is not intended ;-) Correct -- thanks, I've fixed this. We changed the IP address last night for one domain name, but forgot to chan

Re: [sage-devel] Abandon Python 2.6 support?

2016-06-13 Thread Fernando Perez
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:16 PM, William Stein wrote: > This is only for our build system / bootstrapping scripts, not for sage > itself. Ah, I missed that part in the discussion... Sorry for the noise! -- Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org) fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists onl

Re: [sage-devel] Abandon Python 2.6 support?

2016-06-13 Thread William Stein
On Monday, June 13, 2016, Fernando Perez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Erik Bray > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, William Stein > > wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Volker Braun > > wrote: >> >> >> >> Note that we can trivially support Python 2.6 just b

Re: [sage-devel] Abandon Python 2.6 support?

2016-06-13 Thread Fernando Perez
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Volker Braun wrote: > >> > >> Note that we can trivially support Python 2.6 just by vendoring > >> argparse.py. Make user's lives easier or save a fe

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-06-13 Thread Paul Masson
If the error occurs in Mobile Safari, then it's not an issure with the app but with the browser in general, since the app is basically an iOS UIWebView. The only major change made to the web server was adding require.js, right? There is an open issue in their GitHub repository about timeouts on

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Re: http://trac.sagemath.org vs https://trac.sagemath.org

2016-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
Btw when I go to http://sagemathcloud.com then I'm greeted by a cloudflare Error 521 page, presumably this is not intended ;-) On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 3:18:55 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:53 PM, William Stein > wrote: > > Of some relevance -- Harald Schi

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-06-13 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Android app and iOS one are still having issues, below is a detailed report from one of the users. I cannot test/debug these, so any help would be greatly appreciated or they will remain broken... Thank you, Andrey I'm still having issues on the App... I also wrote to the App developer Ivan A

Re: [sage-devel] Re: trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-13 Thread Ralf Stephan
No, it seems to have been resolved for some time now. On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:34 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > It's OK for me (from Paris). Do you still have any issue? > > Eric. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "sage-devel" group.

Re: [sage-devel] Now officially living off your (collective) backs

2016-06-13 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Though of course I'll be the only one to see it this way, right ? ;-) > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/4nkt5u/william_stein_is_leaving_academia_to_start_a/ > > And the usual "Sage: a history in which free developers hardly a

[sage-devel] Re: trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-13 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
It's OK for me (from Paris). Do you still have any issue? Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

[sage-devel] Re: Now officially living off your (collective) backs

2016-06-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Do you also go around and harass every French welfare recipient, cause, you know, he lives off your back? You are boring. On Monday, June 13, 2016 at 10:19:09 AM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Though of course I'll be the only one to see it this way, right ? ;-) > > > https://www.reddit.c

[sage-devel] Now officially living off your (collective) backs

2016-06-13 Thread Nathann Cohen
Though of course I'll be the only one to see it this way, right ? ;-) https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/4nkt5u/william_stein_is_leaving_academia_to_start_a/ And the usual "Sage: a history in which free developers hardly appear though they worked by dozens and over years" slideshow. Reme

Re: [sage-devel] Abandon Python 2.6 support?

2016-06-13 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> >> On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Volker Braun wrote: >>> >>> Note that we can trivially support Python 2.6 just by vendoring >>> argparse.py. Make user's lives easier or save a few kilo

Re: [sage-devel] Abandon Python 2.6 support?

2016-06-13 Thread Erik Bray
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, William Stein wrote: > > > On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Note that we can trivially support Python 2.6 just by vendoring >> argparse.py. Make user's lives easier or save a few kilobytes of disk space? >> How is this not a total slam-dunk?--