[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-06-15 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:44:08 PM UTC-5, Paul Masson wrote: > > A good example is elliptic integrals. Complete elliptic integrals have a > single letter as the function name, while the incomplete integrals require > specifying the modulus or parameter. Since SageMath uses the parameter,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Evaluation of beta() in Sage 7.2

2016-06-15 Thread Paul Masson
Spent some time testing this out earlier today and ready to give positive review, but can't change the ticket in Trac. The server is not responding for me when submitting changes. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 12:32:07 AM UTC-7, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Please review > http://trac.sagemath.org/

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Erik Bray
On Jun 16, 2016 00:05, "William Stein" wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Paul Masson wrote: > > Is there a firm plan in place to move this database to a hosting service? > > It's discouraging to spend time trying to help, only to run into machine > > issues. > > > > Yes. Everything is

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Paul Masson
No change for me. Still can't modify a ticket. Server not responding when submit change. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:05:58 PM UTC-7, William wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Paul Masson > wrote: > > Is there a firm plan in place to move this database to a hosting > service? >

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Paul Masson wrote: > Is there a firm plan in place to move this database to a hosting service? > It's discouraging to spend time trying to help, only to run into machine > issues. > Yes. Everything is mostly setup and ready to go on Google Compute engine, ... but

[sage-devel] Fwd: [gdr-im] Announcing Sollya 5.0

2016-06-15 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Forwarding this announcement of the release of Sollya 5.0. See in particular the last point: * Additional functions in the Sollya library intended to further open Sollya to dynamical extension with bindings such as for Python and Sage. -- Forwarded message -- From: Chr

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Paul Masson
Is there a firm plan in place to move this database to a hosting service? It's discouraging to spend time trying to help, only to run into machine issues. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 12:15:45 PM UTC-7, William wrote: > > I can restart the machine if you guys want... > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 20

[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-06-15 Thread Paul Masson
A good example is elliptic integrals. Complete elliptic integrals have a single letter as the function name, while the incomplete integrals require specifying the modulus or parameter. Since SageMath uses the parameter, a typical format for incomplete integrals has the argument separated from th

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-15 21:15, William Stein wrote: I can restart the machine if you guys want... Maybe you should. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-d

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread William Stein
I can restart the machine if you guys want... On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-06-15 20:59, William Stein wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just typed "service restart apache2" -- is it still slow? I did a >> quick test and it seemed to be working now. > > > Still doesn'

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-06-15 20:59, William Stein wrote: Hi, I just typed "service restart apache2" -- is it still slow? I did a quick test and it seemed to be working now. Still doesn't work for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsub

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Paul Masson
No change for me. Still can't modify tickets. Server timeout. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 12:00:36 PM UTC-7, William wrote: > > Hi, > > I just typed "service restart apache2" -- is it still slow? I did a > quick test and it seemed to be working now. > > William > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread William Stein
Hi, I just typed "service restart apache2" -- is it still slow? I did a quick test and it seemed to be working now. William On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Paul Masson wrote: > Similar for me in San Francisco, except can't make any changes. Server keeps > timing out. > > > On Wednesday, June

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Paul Masson
Similar for me in San Francisco, except can't make any changes. Server keeps timing out. On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 11:49:08 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Currently, this is happening for me right now. Read-only access is still > mostly working, but changing anything takes forever. >

Re: [sage-devel] trac slow/unresponsive

2016-06-15 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Currently, this is happening for me right now. Read-only access is still mostly working, but changing anything takes forever. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a

[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-06-15 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> It occurs to me that latex_name can only be used for functions that do > not need additional formatting, such as subscripts or superscripts. One of > the other two attributes must be used in more complex situations. > > Could you elaborate a bit more on what you want to do here, specifically

[sage-devel] Re: Current best practice for LaTeX of function names

2016-06-15 Thread Ralf Stephan
> > From reading source code, it appears that adding a keyword argument latex_name to the function initialization is equivalent to defining a _print_latex_ attribute for the function. There is also the option to define a _latex_ attribute in addition to _print_latex_. >>> De

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Evaluation of beta() in Sage 7.2

2016-06-15 Thread Ralf Stephan
Please review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12521 On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 8:51:26 PM UTC+2, Paul Masson wrote: > > Ralf, my original input for the beta function has one negative argument. > That returns "NaN" for both Sage 7.2 and 7.3beta4. > > It appears from the discussion here and on Tr