Thanks VIncent, and Volker for the review. According to the ticket I
started to test the change (as I had reported the problem originally
on sage-support), and I don't know why that never got finished.
John
On 9 July 2016 at 22:01, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 5:17:48 PM UTC-5, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
>
> Please don't. That field is suppose to be used for tickets which implement
>> the stopgap when it is applicable
>
>
> Unfortunately stopgaps for all the silent wrong results will hardly be
> accepted.
>
That's just not tru
On 2 July 2016 at 11:11, Jeroen Sijsling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In Sage 7.2 I get the following error:
>
> R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
> pol_rep = [1, -12, 70, -264, 757, -1872, 4258, -8796, 15922, -24900, 33886,
> -40608, 43117, -40608, 33886, -24900, 15922, -8796, 4258, -1872, 757,
> -264, 70, -12, 1
> well, we already have this: https://trac.sagemath.org/report/79
> IMHO it's a great idea to have all such places explicitly marked.
+1. I think it's great to have such a list which contains both the ones
for which we wish to add a stopgap, as well as those we don't/haven't
yet.
If the stopgap f
On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 11:32:57 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> On 09/07/16 18:17, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Please don't. That field is suppose to be used for tickets which
> implement
> >> the stopgap when it is applicable
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately stopgaps for all the si