Another thing that I hope we can eventually start supporting is some basic
category theory, which I feel would justify having a number of categories
at the top level. Nicolas and I have also discussed having things like
Groups().free(foo) as hooks to create free objects (or any other special
ob
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:24:05AM -0700, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>Is there any reason for any categories to exist in the global namespace
>(besides backward compatibility, but this can be worked on) ?
>No, really, it's something that perhaps small% of Sage users have to
>use often, a
Incidentally came across the following [1]:
---
See also:
POSIX users (Linux, BSD, etc.) are strongly encouraged to install and
use the much more recent subprocess32 [2] module instead of the version
included with python 2.7. It
Is there any reason for any categories to exist in the global namespace
(besides backward compatibility, but this can be worked on) ?
No, really, it's something that perhaps small% of Sage users have to use
often, and such users are advanced
enough to use import statements...
On Friday, Septembe
