See https://sage.sis.uta.fi/ . I just learnt that our students do not see
the text "This is part of services available to students of SIS unit. To
get an account see (link)this page(/link)."
A wish for those making frontend(s) to SageMath: please make it easy to
customize failed login -page.
Consider the following code
def g():
function("f", x)
html(04)
g()
which in SageMathCell gives the following warning messages (in Sage itself
and SageMathCloud everything is even more useless without using an extra
module due to
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/-KiMrG--5x8
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 8:56:56 AM UTC, B Krishnan Iyer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Understood, I been to that link earlier and it really helps but in future
> if you are starting a project on more advanced feature(previous feature
> included too) then I will be very interested in taking part
Wasn't stated in the build instructions.
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 5:03:20 AM UTC-4, François wrote:
>
> Not spending the time compiling gcc to get gfortran?
>
> François
>
> > On 13/10/2016, at 22:01, Sébastien Labbé >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 9:07:
I'll make sure to continue to do so in the future if I see those messages!
I usually zone out during builds, glad I caught that line.
Thanks for the help.
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 2:14:37 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-10-12 18:14, Ethan Petersen wrote:
> > there was an "E
Thanks Steven, this worked great for me. Now just have to make sure the
rest of the make goes well.
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 1:40:57 PM UTC-4, Steven Trogdon wrote:
>
> It looks like you are missing libgfortran3 libraries or at least they
> could not be found. Perhaps
>
> apt-get instal
Hi Eric,
Thanks for clearing this up, appreciate your reply!
Ethan
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 3:07:24 PM UTC-4, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to complete Steven's answer: with Ubuntu 16.04, if you install the
> Ubuntu package gfortran-5, your Sage build will use the system gfo
Hello,
Understood, I been to that link earlier and it really helps but in future
if you are starting a project on more advanced feature(previous feature
included too) then I will be very interested in taking part.
Thank you,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 5:39:29 AM UTC, B Krishnan Iyer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think removing that content from the doc isn't the solution. I thinking
> we should work on a feature like this yet it has proof of being useful so
> it justify its need.
>
well, the feature is gone, and the
