[sage-devel] Re: Tuning values needed for MPIR (help needed)

Apparently if you have a very recent machine, yasm may fail to build the assembly files for your architecture. To get around this, install the latest yasm [1] and use MPIR's --with-system-yasm option. If your system is recent and detects as core2 or k8 or simply x86_64 or something else obviously

Re: [sage-devel] ComplexField dilog precision bug

FYI, I found a very similar issue with "exp" and "log" for purely imaginary numbers: http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1896 Nathan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-devel] Re: Sharing my course notes "Logiciels mathématiques"

Bonjour Sébastien, Merci pour le partage. J'espère que ton travail bénéficiera à quelques enseignants et élèves en Belgique et en France. Je ne peux que te remercier à leur place, car pour ma part je ne fais des maths avec SAGE que par pure distraction, et n'utilise pas trop les modules Ipython

[sage-devel] Re: a 7(!) year old (Singular) overflow issue still holds

I can only answer one of your questions. On Saturday, 11 February 2017 17:16:29 UTC+1, Jakob Kroeker wrote: > > By default, Singular uses 16 bit exponents. But it is perfectly capable of >> working with exponents up to 64 bits. That will be slower of course. >> > > How to change this? Is it

[sage-devel] Re: Timeouts on patchbots

I think there is also still an issue where openblas internal state becomes wedged when interrupting; I disabled multi-threading which made it much less frequent but it is not 100% reliable. I'm seeing random issues in /abvar/ occasionally on the buildbot. On Monday, February 13, 2017 at

[sage-devel] Re: Timeouts on patchbots

> > It is my subjective observation that timeouts on patchbots have become > more > frequent. For instance, for ticket > https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/22340/ > two patchbots failed due to timeout, > If I recall correctly, I did hit similar issues when testing sage.

[sage-devel] Tuning values needed for MPIR (help needed)

Hi all, MPIR has been modified recently, and new tuning crossovers have been added. If you have a machine that you want MPIR to run fast on, we would really appreciate help getting tuning values for your machine. Here is how. git clone https://github.com/wbhart/mpir cd mpir ./configure

[sage-devel] Re: Sharing my course notes "Logiciels mathématiques"

Hi Sébastien, Thank you for sharing! Best regards, Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

[sage-devel] Re: Reporting a bug apparently appearing in sage-7.5 and sage-7.5.1 but not in sage-7.4

Thanks a lot Ralf Stefan. Best regards, Eyo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

[sage-devel] Sharing my course notes "Logiciels mathématiques"

Dear sage-devel, During my postdoc at Université de Liège in Belgium, I gave an introduction course to math softwares for first year bachelors. It was a new course in the department, so I needed to prepare from scratch. I could not use Sage as they were unable to install it on the Windows

Re: [sage-devel] Timeouts on patchbots

On 2017-02-13 12:33, Clemens Heuberger wrote: It is my subjective observation that timeouts on patchbots have become more frequent. Possible reasons: 1. Python upgrade: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22037#comment:63 2. People are adding more and more doctests everywhere without

Re: [sage-devel] Boolean-valued functions and seealso-blocks

On 2017-02-13 12:54, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Daniel Krenn wrote: > >> +1 for crosslinks of any kind > > An example: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22377 LGTM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [sage-devel] Boolean-valued functions and seealso-blocks

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Daniel Krenn wrote: +1 for crosslinks of any kind An example: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22377 -- Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-devel] Boolean-valued functions and seealso-blocks

On 2017-02-13 11:29, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > For example https://groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Solvable_group contains > lists "Stronger properties" and "Weaker properties". > > What would you think about SEEALSO-blocks of is_* -functions having list > of nearest stronger and weaker properties? For

[sage-devel] Timeouts on patchbots

It is my subjective observation that timeouts on patchbots have become more frequent. For instance, for ticket https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/22340/ two patchbots failed due to timeout, quasar times out with sage: ls = J0(46)._calculate_endomorphism_generators() ; ls ## line 213 ##

Re: [sage-devel] Boolean-valued functions and seealso-blocks

Very general answer: YES to more crosslinks in the documentation. Corollary: YES to your question. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Boolean-valued functions and seealso-blocks

For example https://groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Solvable_group contains lists "Stronger properties" and "Weaker properties". What would you think about SEEALSO-blocks of is_* -functions having list of nearest stronger and weaker properties? For example is_sectionally_complemented() would have

Re: [sage-devel] ComplexField dilog precision bug

On 2017-02-13 10:19, John Cremona wrote: Thanks Jeroen for the very fast diagnosis and fix. The fix comes from PARI (Karim Belabas to be precise), not me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-devel] ComplexField dilog precision bug

Thanks Jeroen for the very fast diagnosis and fix. On 13 February 2017 at 08:23, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-02-13 09:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> Reported upstream: >> https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1895 > > > And already fixed (within

Re: [sage-devel] ComplexField dilog precision bug

On 2017-02-13 09:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Reported upstream: https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1895 And already fixed (within 30 minutes of reporting it!) I will add the patch to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22276 -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] ComplexField dilog precision bug

Reported upstream: https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1895 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to