Re: [sage-devel] Timeouts on patchbots

2017-02-20 Thread Daniel Krenn
On 2017-02-13 12:33, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > It is my subjective observation that timeouts on patchbots have become more > frequent. For instance, for ticket > https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/22340/ > two patchbots failed due to timeout, I also noticed this to become more frequent. W

Re: [sage-devel] A strange bug I cant't reproduce in any simpler way (LaurentPolynomialRing)

2017-02-20 Thread VulK
I just did it, it seems to work. Thanks S. * Daniel Krenn [2017-02-20 20:47:03]: On 2017-02-20 19:24, VulK wrote: Dear All, I just found a bug I can't really reproduce in any simpler way than the one I have here. I did not open a ticket yet on this because I would like to have a simpler way

Re: [sage-devel] A strange bug I cant't reproduce in any simpler way (LaurentPolynomialRing)

2017-02-20 Thread Daniel Krenn
On 2017-02-20 19:24, VulK wrote: > Dear All, > I just found a bug I can't really reproduce in any simpler way than the > one I have here. I did not open a ticket yet on this because I would > like to have a simpler way to explain the issue first. Any idea? Yes, a bit above from the line where your

[sage-devel] A strange bug I cant't reproduce in any simpler way (LaurentPolynomialRing)

2017-02-20 Thread VulK
Dear All, I just found a bug I can't really reproduce in any simpler way than the one I have here. I did not open a ticket yet on this because I would like to have a simpler way to explain the issue first. Any idea? {{{ sage: LQ = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ, 'x0, x1, x2, y0, y1, y2, y3,

Re: [sage-devel] Doctests broken in ticket #20729

2017-02-20 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 02/14/2017 10:19 AM, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> Add explicit imports to the test, for example: >> >> TESTS:: >> >> sage: from foo import foo >> sage: foo() >> True > > Same error: name 'foo' is not define

Re: [sage-devel] Doctests broken in ticket #20729

2017-02-20 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-02-14 15:54, Michael Orlitzky wrote: I have a few thousand failing doctests like that where I can't simply remove the __init__.py file. Adding __init__.py has specific semantics in Python: it means that your directory (which was a random bunch of Python files) is now a package. For a

[sage-devel] Re: what happened to ipython?

2017-02-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
@bennigoetz reported the same problem in December 2016 : https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/9816#issuecomment-258242213 For now, the only solution seems to go back to IPython 4.x ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsub

Re: [sage-devel] Doctests broken in ticket #20729

2017-02-20 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/20/2017 10:00 AM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > Could we get a little more context for your problem? In particular, is > foo.py included in the Sage source tree or is it something that you are > building separately? If it is the former, have you tried "from path.to.foo > import bar", where the

[sage-devel] Re: what happened to ipython?

2017-02-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
A related issue as fixed in IPython in June 2016: "Multi line paste not working anymore in 5.0 beta" https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/9600 But it does seem to have fixed everything... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-devel] Doctests broken in ticket #20729

2017-02-20 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Could we get a little more context for your problem? In particular, is foo.py included in the Sage source tree or is it something that you are building separately? If it is the former, have you tried "from path.to.foo import bar", where the path is starting from $SAGE_ROOT/src? Best, Travis O

[sage-devel] Re: what happened to ipython?

2017-02-20 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 4:31:04 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > > in SMC at least, if you try to paste in multiple > lines it pastes in the first line and silently **ignores everything > else**. > I have the same problem since Fall 2016 (major IPython upgrade?) when I use tmux with

[sage-devel] Re: BGG Sage microbadge

2017-02-20 Thread kcrisman
Ah, so not Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand then... > I would love to see microbadges on MO like this though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] patchbot error: HTTP Error 413: Request Entity Too Large

2017-02-20 Thread Thierry
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:32:32AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote: > There is no general client request body size limit, this is a configuration > setting for your wsgi server or reverse proxy that is in front of the > patchbot. If you need help debugging this then post the relevant **server** > log

Re: [sage-devel] patchbot error: HTTP Error 413: Request Entity Too Large

2017-02-20 Thread Volker Braun
There is no general client request body size limit, this is a configuration setting for your wsgi server or reverse proxy that is in front of the patchbot. If you need help debugging this then post the relevant **server** log that shows the 413 being triggered. On Thursday, January 26, 2017 a

Re: [sage-devel] patchbot error: HTTP Error 413: Request Entity Too Large

2017-02-20 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-02-20 08:48, Thierry wrote: Hi, On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 08:32:18AM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2017-01-26 10:18, Daniel Krenn wrote: Starting a patchbot results in the error below. Any ideas? This issue makes it *impossible* for me to run a patchbot. If anybody is able to fix th

[sage-devel] Re: imaginary unit I is smaller than 1

2017-02-20 Thread Simon King
Hi, On 2017-02-20, Daniel Krenn wrote: > On 2017-02-19 17:57, rjf wrote: >> It might be comparing the real parts. What did you expect? Perhaps >> Error "<" requires that both operands be members of the same ordered >> field ?? >> Or perhaps just >> False > > I, for sure, did not expect "True".

Re: [sage-devel] Re: patchbot: ticket list latency?

2017-02-20 Thread Daniel Krenn
On 2017-01-08 07:21, Clemens Heuberger wrote: >>> However, if I understand the code correctly, the patchbot should at least >>> see >>> the ticket and report >>> "do not test if some author is not trusted" >>> , which it does not in my case. It's simply not in the downloaded file, its >>> not