My bad, I misread what John meant.
I thought he was asking whether what should be preserved under reset was
defined by IPython, or sage. He was asking about the commands themselves
though.
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 11:01:50 AM UTC-7, Aidan wrote:
>
>
> It looks like they are a mix of
It looks like they are a mix of IPython and Sage.
>From sage.misc.reset:
# Exclude these from the reset command.
# DATA, base64 -- needed by the notebook
EXCLUDE = set(['sage_mode', '__DIR__', 'DIR', 'DATA', 'base64'])
I may be completely wrong, but that's my guess.
On Wednesday, March 29,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:48 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
> It looks like a bug to me.
>
> ┌┐
> │ SageMath version 7.6, Release Date: 2017-03-25 │
> │ Type "notebook()" for
It looks like a bug to me.
┌┐
│ SageMath version 7.6, Release Date: 2017-03-25 │
│ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.│
Type "help()" for help.
Hi Simon,
Thanks for getting in touch,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +, Simon King wrote:
> Just to make people aware: 9 years ago, it was decided to
> override Parent.__contains__ for CombinatorialFreeModule,
> thus working around Sage's coercion framework. I guess we
> should
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:00:14AM -0700, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 2:23:14 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> >
> > On 2017-03-29 11:24, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > > Is the following a bug, or not:
> >
> > A bug in what :-)
> >
>
> in pari (why don't
Hi,
Is the following normal:
sage: a=2; a
2
sage: reset()
sage: a
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NameError: name 'a' is not defined
sage: quit
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NameError: name 'quit' is not defined
See the question on AskSage:
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 2:23:14 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2017-03-29 11:24, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > Is the following a bug, or not:
>
> A bug in what :-)
>
in pari (why don't they chop off a factor of x^j, it costs next to nothing)
(or Sage can do this, too)
> This
Hi!
Just to make people aware: 9 years ago, it was decided to
override Parent.__contains__ for CombinatorialFreeModule,
thus working around Sage's coercion framework. I guess we
should try to remove the custom CombinatorialFreeModule.__contains__,
which is why I created #22707 (the branch hasn't
On 2017-03-29 11:24, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Is the following a bug, or not:
A bug in what :-)
This is already interesting (on Linux):
sage: float(RR(3).sqrt())
1.7320508075688772
sage: float(RDF(3).sqrt())
1.7320508075688772
sage: float(RR(sqrt(3)))
1.7320508075688772
sage:
Is the following a bug, or not:
# Sage 7.6 built with clang 3.8 on x86_64 FreeBSD 11.0 (see #22679)
sage: z=(1/2)*(1+RDF(sqrt(3))*CDF.0); z
0.5 + 0.8660254037844386*I
sage: [z.algdep(k) for k in [2..6]]
[x^2 - x + 1, x^3 - x^2 + x, x^3 - x^2 + x, x^5 + x^2, x^5 + x^2]
# Sage 7.6 on x86_64 Linux
11 matches
Mail list logo