Does this mean that eventually a solution to the texinfo crossreferencing
problem in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21734 could be found?
(essentially, the problem was, if I remember correctly, that the way sphinx
for sage is set up, sage is not a single project. Instead, we have many
"exter
See http://opendreamkit.org/2017/06/09/CythonSphinx/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group
i also think that relations involving vectors and matrices would be nice,
like `sage: ex = vector([x^2+y, y]) == vector([0, 1])`. in fact it exists
in trac (with matrices): https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/5201
El viernes, 9 de junio de 2017, 18:16:39 (UTC+2), LudJam escribió:
>
> Sage consider
Sage consider 1D symbolic expression as "sage symbolic expression" but in
higher dimension it considers it as a bool.
%var x,y
ex = [[x^2+y],[y]] == [[0],[1]]
type(ex)
gives
while
ex = x^2+y == 0
type(ex)
gives of course
Wouldn't it be useful to be able to create sage symbolic expressio
