[sage-devel] Re: What to do with the "Timed out" failures of patchbots?

2017-07-07 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Friday, July 7, 2017 at 4:38:14 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > (4) Try to find out why these tests time out and fix the underlying issue > Isn't the issue is that the tests in the file actually take more time in total than the limit set by SAGE_TIMEOUT_LONG, especially when the machine

[sage-devel] Re: What to do with the "Timed out" failures of patchbots?

2017-07-07 Thread Volker Braun
(4) Try to find out why these tests time out and fix the underlying issue -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] What to do with the "Timed out" failures of patchbots?

2017-07-07 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Hi, Nowadays, it seems frequent that patchbots report "Timed out" failures. The files "plot.py" and "test.py" are often to blame. These patchbot reports are false in the sense that the ticket that is tested is not the cause of the failure. What should we do? I can think of three options (1)

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Old-style packages

2017-07-07 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-07-07 13:24, Simon King wrote: However I was told that the plan to add optional extension modules will not be supported. Who has said this? We do currently have several optional extension modules (in particular, one implementing matrices using meataxe, where you were involved in

[sage-devel] Re: Old-style packages

2017-07-07 Thread Simon King
On 2017-07-06, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > There is also Simon's package about group cohomology, with an upgrade still > in the works IIRC. Yes. At some point I had the plan to make a separate new-style package for the C-code of my spkg, put the GAP- and Singular-code of my spkg

[sage-devel] Re: About the patchbot queue

2017-07-07 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Thanks for your answer. The author is not trusted probably because it is his first ticket in Sage. What is the policy about this? Does an author become trusted after a first ticket by him has been accepted? I understand we are short of patchbots and I am considering setting up one in my

[sage-devel] Re: About the patchbot queue

2017-07-07 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
And you can even launch manuallly your own patchbot on a ticket that you want to be tested right now.. Le vendredi 7 juillet 2017 08:07:48 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am reviewing the ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22951; it has > been in the status "needs_review"

[sage-devel] Re: About the patchbot queue

2017-07-07 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
The author is not trusted: https://patchbot.sagemath.org/trust_check?who=Karim%20Van%20Aelsthttps://patchbot.sagemath.org/trust_check?who=Karim%20Van%20Aelst so no patchbot is going to ever look at it. You can bypass this restriction by running your own patchbot and adding someone to its local

[sage-devel] About the patchbot queue

2017-07-07 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Hi, I am reviewing the ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22951; it has been in the status "needs_review" for 10 days and yet has not been visited by any patchbot. Is such a long queueing delay common? Can something be done to trigger a first patchbot visit? Thanks for your help. Eric.