On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, kcrisman wrote:
BuildError: Could not build url for endpoint 'worksheet_publish' with
values ['id', 'username']. Did you mean 'worksheet.worksheet_publish'
instead?
Hmm. Probably related:
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/38486/build-error-when-uploading
Dear Dan,
Thanks for the report! This is indeed a bug. If you want to go further
and fix the bug yourself, the procedure is described here
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/
Otherwise I will open the relevant ticket.
Vincent
On 20/08/2017 19:59, Daniel Roche wrote:
Hi sagers,
Firs
Hi sagers,
First let me say thanks for the great piece of software that is sage. You
all do a tremendous job and maybe don't get thanked enough.
There appears to be a bug in sparse matrix multiplication over small finite
fields:
sage: p = next_prime(2**15); p
32771
sage: M = Matrix(GF(p), 1,3,
On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 6:02:32 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 20 August 2017 at 17:47, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde > wrote:
> >
> > Vincent Delecroix writes:
> >
> >> If the basis of a "Finite dimensional module with basis" is always
> assumed to be
> >> ordered, then such method m
On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 5:27:55 PM UTC+1, fidelbc wrote:
>
> Just created the ticket [1]. Not reported to GLPK, do you recommend to do
> so?
>
no, GLPK (with default parameters) is certainly not guilty here.
It's just a precision loss that is not avoidable while computing with
floating p
On 20 August 2017 at 17:47, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote:
>
> Vincent Delecroix writes:
>
>> If the basis of a "Finite dimensional module with basis" is always assumed
>> to be
>> ordered, then such method make sense. However, the terminology is quite
>> strange.
>> I see 1+1/2 ambiguities for m
Vincent Delecroix writes:
> If the basis of a "Finite dimensional module with basis" is always assumed to
> be
> ordered, then such method make sense. However, the terminology is quite
> strange.
> I see 1+1/2 ambiguities for matrices over polynomial ring such as Mat(ZZ[X],
> 3).
>
> 1) leadin
Just created the ticket [1]. Not reported to GLPK, do you recommend to do
so?
Wasn't sure who to CC, please edit the ticket if you have any suggestions.
[1]: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23658#ticket
On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 6:58:19 AM UTC-4, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Might be due to round
Certainly, a procedure that carelessly adds inequalities to an LP formulation
solved by a solver working with a machine precision is going to exhibit this
sort of behaviour on a sufficiently bad example. Thus, yes, it should be fixed
by setting the default solver to be PPK.
--
You received thi
Might be due to roundoff issue (?). PPL does exact solving (using
rationals from GMP) while GLPK works with floating point numbers.
Though, on such small instance it looks suspicious that floating point
are to blame (especially if CBC/Coin works fine). Is there a Sage ticket
open? Was it report
If the basis of a "Finite dimensional module with basis" is always
assumed to be ordered, then such method make sense. However, the
terminology is quite strange. I see 1+1/2 ambiguities for matrices over
polynomial ring such as Mat(ZZ[X], 3).
1) leading_coefficient might be a termwise applicat
Travis Scrimshaw writes:
>> While it is arguably too rigid to say that this is "senseless" (as I
>> wrote in the subject),
>
> You already did that, and because you started off calling them "senseless,"
> you have polluted this issue with your heavily loaded question. That is
> unfair and demea
Afaik nbconvert always dependend on pandoc for certain types of output
(like PDF). Just like LaTeX (which is also a dependency), users have to
have typesetting tools installed.
On Sunday, August 20, 2017 at 9:51:37 AM UTC+2, François Bissey wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am bit concerned by the new
Hi all,
I am bit concerned by the new version of nbconvert released upstream (5.2.1).
Sage currently uses 4.2.0 as a standard package.
nbconvert now uses pandoc which is an haskell package.
That’s what my upgrade path for nbconvert, from zero haskell on the system,
looks like in Gentoo:
[ebuild N
14 matches
Mail list logo