Re: [sage-devel] On (di)graph generation

(There is #24004 with positive_review, so I code changes should be thinked after next beta.) On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Robert Miller wrote: 4) When is augment='edges' usefull? Is One reason it is useful: You can use the argument "property" to restrict to a subclass of graphs. This argument

Re: [sage-devel] Re: optional package mpfrcx not on the mirror

Thanks Volker. On 11/10/2017 20:05, Volker Braun wrote: fixed! On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 10:17:12 AM UTC+2, Maarten Derickx wrote: This is probably because it is still in beta. The tarbal can be found at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11806 -- You received this message because you

Re: [sage-devel] Issues installing the optional "libhomfly" package

I can reproduce this linking error on OSX; I've opened #24015 to track this error. On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 10:31:16 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Jesse H > > wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have been trying

[sage-devel] Re: optional package mpfrcx not on the mirror

fixed! On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 10:17:12 AM UTC+2, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > This is probably because it is still in beta. The tarbal can be found at > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11806 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group

Re: [sage-devel] On (di)graph generation

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > 4) When is augment='edges' usefull? Is > One reason it is useful: You can use the argument "property" to restrict to a subclass of graphs. This argument takes a function and filters the output by testing against this property. If this pr

Re: [sage-devel] On (di)graph generation

On Wednesday, October 11, 2017 at 10:20:02 AM UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, David Joyner wrote: > > >> 1) list(graphs.nauty_geng(0)) gives empty list, whereas Sage knows a > >> graph of 0 vertices. Can someone ask McKay to handle this special case > >> too? > > > Would

Re: [sage-devel] Issues installing the optional "libhomfly" package

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Jesse H wrote: > Greetings, > > I have been trying to use the function "homfly_polynomial()" from the Link > package in Sage, but it requires an optional package "libhomfly": > http://files.sagemath.org/spkg/upstream/libhomfly/index.html. > > Unfortunately, when I

Re: [sage-devel] On (di)graph generation

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, David Joyner wrote: 1) list(graphs.nauty_geng(0)) gives empty list, whereas Sage knows a graph of 0 vertices. Can someone ask McKay to handle this special case too? Wouldn't it be easier to simply catch that case in the nauty_geng method? Could be done, but needs some

Re: [sage-devel] Issues installing the optional "libhomfly" package

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > to install Boehm GC Sage package, do > > sage -i gc gc is a standard package (dependency of ecl) so it would already be installed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubs

Re: [sage-devel] On (di)graph generation

On Oct 11, 2017 1:45 AM, "Jori Mäntysalo" wrote: 1) list(graphs.nauty_geng(0)) gives empty list, whereas Sage knows a graph of 0 vertices. Can someone ask McKay to handle this special case too? Wouldn't it be easier to simply catch that case in the nauty_geng method? 2) Is there an example of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Please help with #23967 Coercion pushout for FGP_modules

OK I have implemented the less easy version with construction functors. That seems to be the best practice. The ticket is ready for review. On Monday, October 9, 2017 at 7:55:13 PM UTC+2, David Roe wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Simon Brandhorst > wrote: > >> It helps a bit. Thou