I would try getting rid of "-static" in that call to gcc.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
I know its an experimental package, but it is something that some of us
would like to see made into an optional spkg someday. I've been trying to
install it on a Sage install on a small cluster, but because its GCC 4, it
is using the GCC included with Sage. I think that is the difference with my
I don't entirely agree with Vincent's fix as it hides the symptom of the
underlying problem: the quotient is not in finite fields:
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(GF(3))
sage: f = x^2 + x + 2
sage: K. = f.root_field()
sage: K.category()
Category of commutative no zero divisors quotients of algebras ove
Fixed in
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24114
needs review!
Vincent
On 26/10/2017 12:45, 'B. L.' via sage-devel wrote:
Dear Vincent,
thank you for your suggestions!
For me, working as a Sage developer is not a question of interest, but a
question of time...
Currently, I will not be able
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:38 PM, John Cremona wrote:
> On 26 October 2017 at 11:18, Erik Bray wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Harald Schilly
>> wrote:
>>> Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed
>>> out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torren
Dear Vincent,
thank you for your suggestions!
For me, working as a Sage developer is not a question of interest, but a
question of time...
Currently, I will not be able to contribute in this regard.
Best regards
Barbara
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
On 26 October 2017 at 11:18, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>> Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed
>> out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files here
>> http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed
> out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files here
> http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have checksums and what would be
> missing is to sign them.
Dear Barbara,
Thanks for your detailed report!
In this case, if it just boils down to have a .list() method, it should
be straightforward to implement. Would you be interested in working on
this? The procedure to make modification to Sage source code is
described in the developer guide
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
>>
>> During the
>> [discussion](https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/fE45025Wphs/mKdCAeNhAgAJ)
>> of the inclusion of OpenSSL, a few remarks were mafdeabout the security
Dear Sage-Developers,
I came across the following issue / feature request when working with the
coding theory classes:
Getting a syndrome table of a code over GF(9) works, but using a
'hand-crafted version' of GF(9) will not work, although(?) the available
decoders include 'Syndrome'.
See the S
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
>
> Le mercredi 25 octobre 2017 18:10:02 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>>
>> On 2017-10-25 18:01, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>> > Your inputs, please ?
>>
>> I think it is completely pointless. And it's never going to work in
>> pra
Hi, I don't see how https helps with any such attack. What I always pointed
out is to use checksums. e.g. the webseed torrent files
here http://files.sagemath.org/torrents.html have checksums and what would
be missing is to sign them. AFAIK there is no official public/private key
for files on s
On 9 September 2017 at 10:04, David Roe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'd like to organize some online Sage Days, where people gather on
> zulip.sagemath.org and work on Sage together. The two things to be
> decided are
>
Sounds good.
1. What topics should we focus on?
> 2. What days/times work for
There are various downloads that we need to consider:
(A) Downloads of Sage-the-distribution source/binary tarballs
(B) Cloning the git repo
(C) Downloading tarballs while building from the git repo
I think that (A) should be our primary worry, since those are usually
not checked by anybody. Fo
15 matches
Mail list logo
