Re: [sage-devel] Re: Development tasks

On 11/09/2017 05:38 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > I saw that there is work on supporting python 3. Is there more that > needs doing on that? > > Desperately. Follow this: > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15530 Kyankyu Lee, Thanks. François created a trac account for me. I'm looking

[sage-devel] Re: Development tasks

> > I saw that there is work on supporting python 3. Is there more that needs > doing on that? > Desperately. Follow this: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15530 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sage-devel] Coercion about finite field extensions, again

On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 6:17:41 PM UTC+9, John Cremona wrote: > > On 9 November 2017 at 00:50, Kwankyu Lee > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From a discussion last year, I know that creation of finite fields with > > generator names is different from without generator

[sage-devel] matplotlib 2.1.0 upgrade - help wanted

Hi all, So in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23696 we are working on getting matplotlib 2.1.0 in. Initially it was 2.0.2 and if we had moved quicker the issues we found by moving to 2.1.0 instead would have been left to rot for a few more months. 2.1.0 has introduced a lot of deprecation, user

[sage-devel] openBlas compile error

I'm running under Ubuntu 17.10, which is in a VM under under VirtualBox. OpenBlas is complaining that it can't work out the CPU type. /proc/cpuinfo shows it as: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7500U CPU @ 2.70GHz I think that might have already been addressed with an update version of openBlas

[sage-devel] Re: Symbolic Matrix Calculus in Sagemath

Asking for suggestions from the person(s) who will have to approve the result is always a good idea. I looked around some more for applications of matrix calculus, and do not see much evidence regarding my initial evaluation. There seem to be some optimization and machine learning chat about

[sage-devel] Development tasks

I've been using Sage on and off for a number of years, and am currently using it while re-learning the calculus I took 35+ years ago. I'm definitely the oldest in my class this time around! I'm running the current dev version under Ubuntu 17.04. I have to move to another laptop temporarily.

Re: [sage-devel] Coercion about finite field extensions, again

On 9 November 2017 at 00:50, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Hi, > > From a discussion last year, I know that creation of finite fields with > generator names is different from without generator names. But still the > following is counter-intuitive. > > sage: k=GF(4) > sage: