On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hopefully, you are unblocked. This is more than weird! Why on earth could
> you be blocked!? I will investigate in the logs.
Yes, I'm unblocked. If anybody else is not using ask.sagemath due to
being blocked,
Hopefully, you are unblocked. This is more than weird! Why on earth
could you be blocked!? I will investigate in the logs.
On 10/11/2017 21:26, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I'm using "William Stein2 (karma: 2069, badges: ● 1)". Please
unblock me.I'm not a spammer :-)
William
On Fri, Nov 10
Hi,
I'm using "William Stein2 (karma: 2069, badges: ● 1)". Please
unblock me.I'm not a spammer :-)
William
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> which account are you using? "William Stein" (wst...@gmail.com) or "William
> Stein 2" (wst...
Why does this not work:
sage: K. = PowerSeriesRing(QQ, 't', 5)
sage: R. = K[]
sage: F = y^2 + y - 2*t - 3*t^2 - t^3
sage: F.discriminant().sqrt()
1 + 4*t - 2*t^2 + 10*t^3 - 42*t^4 + O(t^5)
but
sage: F.roots()
---
TypeError
which account are you using? "William Stein" (wst...@gmail.com) or
"William Stein 2" (wst...@sagemath.com)? There is something weird with
the second one.
On 10/11/2017 20:39, William Stein wrote:
Why is my account always blocked?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
This is now
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24195
I regard this behavior as a bug.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@google
Thanks. Created https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24193
David
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Simon Brandhorst
wrote:
> {{{
> sage: f=x^22 + 9*x^21 + 16*x^20 - 92*x^19 - 408*x^18 - 144*x^17 +
> 2080*x^16 + 4096*x^15 + 128*x^14 - 8192*x^13 - 12800*x^12 - 18432*x^11 -
> 51200*x^10 - 131072*x^9 +
Hi,
The aim of the patchbot is to test trac tickets
(http://trac.sagemath.org/) in order to help reviewers. Indeed,
patchbots apply patches (formally these are git branches from
https://git.sagemath.org/) and run the Sage testsuite (which are mostly
doctests).
For Sage there is a pool of pa
Vincent,
That sounds interesting too. Years ago I deployed a buildbot for our
company, so I'm familiar with it. It has probably changed since then.
I thought that buildbot could used to apply patches.
Is the idea behind patchbot that it is simpler system dedicated to
trying out patches at the re
Thanks very much, the paper is quite helpful.
On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 10:54:10 PM UTC+5, rjf wrote:
>
>
> Asking for suggestions from the person(s) who will have to approve
> the result is always a good idea.
>
>
> I looked around some more for applications of matrix calculus, and
> do
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:47:23PM +0100, Erik Bray wrote:
[...]
> I don't understand the issue here--if a package is a dependency of
> Sage then it will be built, right? This only seems to apply to
> optional packages.
Yes. As far as i am concerned, optional packages are a very important part
of
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Thierry
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Thierry wrote:
> [...]
>> But, if we want to add an option to let the patchbot install a new package
>> proposed by some ticket, after testing that ticket, the patchbot will be
>> in a different state than
Hi Thierry, thanks for clarifying on this--
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Thierry
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:35:51PM +0100, Erik Bray wrote:
>> It seems to me those should be among the most important, if not *the*
>> most important tickets to farm out to patchbots across multi
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:04:36PM +0100, Thierry wrote:
[...]
> But, if we want to add an option to let the patchbot install a new package
> proposed by some ticket, after testing that ticket, the patchbot will be
> in a different state than before to test other tickets, in this situation,
> the p
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:35:51PM +0100, Erik Bray wrote:
> It seems to me those should be among the most important, if not *the*
> most important tickets to farm out to patchbots across multiple
> platforms. If it made sense to I would set my Windows patchbot to
> prioritize these among all
It seems to me those should be among the most important, if not *the*
most important tickets to farm out to patchbots across multiple
platforms. If it made sense to I would set my Windows patchbot to
prioritize these among all others.
New versions of packages are far more likely to break across
p
Dear Andy,
You could also help improving the patchbot (written in pure Python)
https://github.com/sagemath/sage-patchbot
For example:
* fixing some false positive
* better support for testing of optional packages
* logs should not go in SAGE_ROOT/logs/patchbot/
Would you be interested?
V
{{{
sage: f=x^22 + 9*x^21 + 16*x^20 - 92*x^19 - 408*x^18 - 144*x^17 + 2080*x^16
+ 4096*x^15 + 128*x^14 - 8192*x^13 - 12800*x^12 - 18432*x^11 - 51200*x^10 -
131072*x^9 + 8192*x^8 + 1048576*x^7 + 2129920*x^6 - 589824*
: x^5 - 6684672*x^4 - 6029312*x^3 + 4194304*x^2 + 9437184*x + 4194304
:
18 matches
Mail list logo
