[sage-devel] Re: manifolds.utilities.py: ExpressionNice()

Thank you. I missed that in the examples. Is there documentation listing all Manifold.options? I cannot find one with the documentation search. On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 3:40:41 PM UTC-8, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > HI, > > Le samedi 18 novembre 2017 23:55:35 UTC+1, Richard_L a écrit :

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 5:52:13 PM UTC-5, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > The conclusion from Erik Bray's issue report seems to be that if a user > posts an answers containing a url but this user's karma is less than the > threshold to post links, then the answer is blocked from being

[sage-devel] Re: manifolds.utilities.py: ExpressionNice()

HI, Le samedi 18 novembre 2017 23:55:35 UTC+1, Richard_L a écrit : > > Applying ExpressionNice() to an expression containing partial derivatives > cleans up the presentation, suppressing the display of function arguments > in the partial derivatives. However, zeroth order derivatives (i.e., the

[sage-devel] manifolds.utilities.py: ExpressionNice()

Applying ExpressionNice() to an expression containing partial derivatives cleans up the presentation, suppressing the display of function arguments in the partial derivatives. However, zeroth order derivatives (i.e., the function alone) are not cleaned up. I think it would be useful to extend

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

The conclusion from Erik Bray's issue report seems to be that if a user posts an answers containing a url but this user's karma is less than the threshold to post links, then the answer is blocked from being submitted. Instead, shouldn't it be added to the moderation queue? Or would that make the

[sage-devel] mpir-3.0.0 on skylake (OSX only?) problem, see and review #24085

I've made #24085 a blocker, as people reporting the same issue on 8.1.rc2. Could please people suffering from this bug please test https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24085 and say here or on the ticket whether this does the job? (Review the ticket too, naturally). -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 8.0 Build Error on MacOS, [mpir-3.0.0.p0] Error building MPIR.

On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 8:42:48 PM UTC, Michael Frey wrote: > > This is still broken ins Sage 8.1.rc2 with the same error. Should I post > a new thread? > please try the branch on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24085 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Build of Sage 8.0 from Source failed on OpenSuse Tumbleweed (gcc-5.4.0 build failed)

8.1 will have gcc 7.2.0. > On 19/11/2017, at 11:15, foolish...@gmail.com wrote: > > Based on the error message and a bit of a search, I think it may be related > to https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=249731, which > states: > "Use ucontext_t not struct ucontext in linux-unwind.h

Re: [sage-devel] Build of Sage 8.0 from Source failed on OpenSuse Tumbleweed (gcc-5.4.0 build failed)

Why is sage trying to build gcc-5.4.0 when you have 7.2.1? Are you missing gfortran? Building an older version of gcc with a newer one like this usually leads to trouble. François > On 19/11/2017, at 08:23, foolish...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Hello All: > > I have a fairly new laptop and am

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 8.0 Build Error on MacOS, [mpir-3.0.0.p0] Error building MPIR.

This is still broken ins Sage 8.1.rc2 with the same error. Should I post a new thread? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbot and its trust issues

On 16/11/2017 11:32, Erik Bray wrote: On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, David Loeffler wrote: I'd like to request opinions on whether we should get rid of the "Trusted Authors" check in the Sage patchbot. At present, the patchbot won't test a ticket unless all of

Re: [sage-devel] Is the sage tree moveable or sessile ?

Thank you, Jeroen. This will be corrected. -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le samedi 18 novembre 2017 09:54:01 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > On 2017-11-18 09:22, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > You *should* be able to move the sage-x.y.z/ directory anywhere you > > want. If you copy the

Re: [sage-devel] Is the sage tree moveable or sessile ?

On 2017-11-18 09:22, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: You *should* be able to move the sage-x.y.z/ directory anywhere you want. If you copy the sage script or make a symbolic link to it, you should modify the script to reflect this (as instructed at the top of the script). It is best

[sage-devel] Is the sage tree moveable or sessile ?

I sem to remember that the Sage tree can (or, at least, should) no longer be moved after building. However, we still document the relocation of this tree in the README.md fike : You *should* be able to move the sage-x.y.z/ directory anywhere you want. If you copy the sage script or make a