[sage-devel] Re: Could some kind soul review #24969 ?

Emmanuel Charpentier: > Trac #24969 upgrades R to the recently released 3.4.4. > Having it in Sage 8.2 could be useful to Sage's R users > (which are not legion, conceded...). > > As usual with R, Review on Mac and Windows are more than welcome... > > --> Emmanuel Charpentier Just saw this got

[sage-devel] NTL v11

I just uploaded a new version of NTL, which is available at http://www.shoup.net/ntl In addition to a few performance improvements, I've also made the configuration script and makefile a bit more intelligent. I've also changed several defaults, so that now, by default, NTL builds in thread

[sage-devel] Re: Possible bug in gen_legendre_P (associated Legendre polynomials)

Hi, Le mardi 27 mars 2018 14:46:52 UTC+2, Ralf Stephan a écrit : > > > I think it will suffice for now to put the fact in the documentation. > I am afraid this is not sufficient: a consequence of this bug is that Sage gives a silly answer for something as elementary as the spherical harmonic

Re: [sage-devel] Gauss sum for the Dirichet character modulo 1

Sure! I'll do it. El jueves, 5 de abril de 2018, 12:15:30 (UTC-3), David Loeffler escribió: > > Sounds reasonable to me. Can you open a trac ticket for this? > > On 28 March 2018 at 18:01, Nicolás Sirolli > wrote: > >> The Gauss sum for the Dirichlet character modulo 1 is

[sage-devel] Re: Internet access during tests

Hi Samuel, On 2018-04-08, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> 2. The vast majority of my spkg's tests start with calling a function >> that is responsible for providing data on a cohomology ring; if the >> data is locally available, then it is just loaded; if it isn't, but >>

[sage-devel] PY_NEW(Integer) and Integer.__new__(Integer)

Dear all, What is the status of Integer.__new__(Integer) vs PY_NEW(Integer). One can find both versions in the source code $ grep -R "PY_NEW(Integer)" | wc -l 152 $ grep -R "Integer.__new__(Integer)" | wc -l 94 But the doc of PY_NEW (ext/stdsage.pxd) says that we should avoid the second one

[sage-devel] Re: Internet access during tests

Le samedi 7 avril 2018 13:06:07 UTC+2, Simon King a écrit : > > On 2018-04-07, Thierry wrote: > > I am sorry to insist, but what is wrong with adding > > > > # optional -- internet > > > > on doctests that might connect to the internet ? > > 1. As I was reminded