[sage-devel] SciPy 2019 Conference - 10 days left for submissions, registration now open

2019-02-05 Thread Paul Ivanov
SciPy 2019, the 18th annual Scientific Computing with Python conference, will be held July 8-14, 2019 in Austin, Texas. The annual SciPy Conference brings together over 800 participants from industry, academia, and government to showcase their latest projects, learn from skilled users and developer

Re: [sage-devel] Re: compiling sage failed

2019-02-05 Thread brettpim
make doc-clean and running make again on second computer worked. thanks for your help brett On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 10:50:54 UTC-5, brettpim wrote: > > On the second computer I ran make doc-clean and am trying again > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: compiling sage failed

2019-02-05 Thread brettpim
On my first computer everything compiled fine after I cleared SAGE_LOCAL On the second computer I ran make doc-clean and am trying again -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: compiling sage failed

2019-02-05 Thread brettpim
On my first computer everything compiled fine after I cleared SAGE_LOCAL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. T

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac #22029: Python 3 style comparisons

2019-02-05 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
> Out of curiosity: How many existing tests fail for that reason? We had to fix a *huge* number of issues because of comparing apples and oranges. It was one of the biggest porting efforts towards Python 3, that's why I consider it a big deal. Look at the long list of dependencies on Trac #22029

[sage-devel] Re: Trac #22029: Python 3 style comparisons

2019-02-05 Thread Simon King
On 2019-02-05, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > The change in the code is quite small, but the implications are big, so > that's why I wanted to mention it here on sage-devel. Out of curiosity: How many existing tests fail for that reason? Even though the implications are big, I suppose we do not have ma

[sage-devel] Trac #22029: Python 3 style comparisons

2019-02-05 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Trac ticket #22029 changes the coercion model such that comparisons of Element instances now behave like in Python 3. This means that comparisons of elements with uncomparable types/parents will raise an error instead of returning some random answer. I believe that this is an important step in