Hello,
Can someone having the required superpowers please close the 61
duplicate/invalid/wonfix tickets that have a positive review on trac ?
Frédéric
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Hi Mao,
Right now in Sage, there is somewhat limited support for specialized
sparse matrix operations, such as computing the echelon form. I believe the
current algorithm for the echelon form is done using Sage's own
implementation and does not take advantage of the sparsity. (You can
It's the first time I post here. I don't know if sage-devel or sage-support
is the more appropriate mailing list. How does Sage implement the method
echelon_form() for sparse matrices over finite fields? Is LinBox the
default backend? (I'm not a Sage developer, but would like to know about
Thanks, Eric.
I never would have guessed that I could not use the most common notation in
quantum mechanics!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
>
> Chained relations are a nonsense notation to begin with. You should
> avoid using them on principle to demonstrate pedantic superiority =)
> Seriously though, the notation is ambiguous and can cause a lot of
> confusion (case in point...) to save a few characters. Not a profitable
>
Hi,
Le vendredi 22 février 2019 21:33:38 UTC+1, Richard_L a écrit :
>
> I conclude there is something about the scalar field which is not being
> defined until the .display() is executed.
> Is this the intended behavior, or an oversight?
>
The issue is not related to scalar fields: it is
